I do not see the 'neither' option.
Syria would be marginally preferable.
for what ???
i wish the world power really wanted a real democracy there.......
for what ???
i wish the world power really wanted a real democracy there.......
?????????????? What are you saying?
And yet you criticize these same people for not intervening in Bosnia soon enough?
Syria. And it's not even close.
Libya proved that we CAN get in, get the job done, and then get out with minimal loss of life to our troops. And oh yeah, we've done it before--See "Desert Storm."
Hard to say.If we must use force in the M E would it be more helpful in Syria or Iran right now?
Yeah. And it also proved that when you back AQ affiliates and members (Al Qaeda may already be among Libya's rebels - World Watch - CBS News) (Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links - Telegraph) that you end up with Sharia law. (Libyan leader's embrace of Sharia raises eyebrows - CNN.com)
There are Al Qaeda in the Syrian rebels (Al-Qaeda Joins the Syrian Rebellion) (U.S.: Al Qaeda, other extremists aiding Syrian rebels | WashingtonExaminer.com) and they are seeking an Islamic state (Jihadists join Aleppo fight, eye Islamic state, surgeon says | Reuters)
So.... get the civilians out, get the WMD out, and then sell weapons to both sides?
Undoable, but would be fun to watch!
So.... get the civilians out, get the WMD out, and then sell weapons to both sides?