• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Political debate: Is it possible to concede a point in a debate...

Is it possible to concede a point in a debate without conceding your entire point-of-


  • Total voters
    19

radcen

Phonetic Mnemonic ©
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
34,817
Reaction score
18,576
Location
Look to your right... I'm that guy.
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
Political debate: Is it possible to concede a point in a debate without conceding your entire point-of-view?

This one is a pretty straight forward question with only a 'yes' or 'no' answer possible..
 
I do it all the time.
 
Political debate: Is it possible to concede a point in a debate without conceding your entire point-of-view?

This one is a pretty straight forward question with only a 'yes' or 'no' answer possible..

if one is honest, logical, and objective of course it is.
 
No. Your point of view should be malleable to new evidence. You concede a point, you adapt your point of view. Hence the latter changes.
 
No. Your point of view should be malleable to new evidence. You concede a point, you adapt your point of view. Hence the latter changes.

Not usually. A point of view is also a larger perspective, which need not be sacrificed each time a smaller point of contention occurs. If I am for gay marriage, and one of my reasons for why it should exist is somehow eroded by evidence, I needn't strike my support for gay marriage because of it.
 
Not usually. A point of view is also a larger perspective, which need not be sacrificed each time a smaller point of contention occurs. If I am for gay marriage, and one of my reasons for why it should exist is somehow eroded by evidence, I needn't strike my support for gay marriage because of it.

A sort of irreducible complexity here. Because no label exists to support your new political viewpoint on account of new evidence you have no way to describe the fact you have a new viewpoint. You are among many others who support gay marriage but with a completely different viewpoint depending on whether you accepted the new "evidence". The label may not exist, but with new evidence you have become entirely unique from the person beforehand.
 
I don't see why not, theoretically at least. If your arguments supporting your position are A, B and C but you concede that B is not correct or doesn't actually support your position, you still have A and C.
 
Political debate: Is it possible to concede a point in a debate without conceding your entire point-of-view?

This one is a pretty straight forward question with only a 'yes' or 'no' answer possible..

Of course.



:coffeepap
 
Political debate: Is it possible to concede a point in a debate without conceding your entire point-of-view?

This one is a pretty straight forward question with only a 'yes' or 'no' answer possible..


I concede aspects of my point of view all the time....that doesnt make me change my perspective in its entirely...
 
Political debate: Is it possible to concede a point in a debate without conceding your entire point-of-view?

This one is a pretty straight forward question with only a 'yes' or 'no' answer possible..

Why wouldn't it be?

My 'point of view' isn't based on just one point - and sometimes it might just enhance my view rather than detract from it :shrug:
 
Of course. I've done so more than once.
 
Political debate: Is it possible to concede a point in a debate without conceding your entire point-of-view?

This one is a pretty straight forward question with only a 'yes' or 'no' answer possible..

I've conceded a lot. When I was originally in politics, I was a democratic socialist. Now, I'm a Russell Kirk conservative.

You just have to find a framework that makes sense. If someone points out you have a screw loose, then it depends on the screw. Sometimes, you tighten it up. Other times, you change a panel. Other times, you change the chassis.
 
Back
Top Bottom