I wouldn't admit that. I was actually giving you the benefit of the doubt.I never once trolled or poed this thread,
Guy, first you give every reason possible why you think nobody should disparage Muhammed, then you claim that you don't think it should be a crime - well unless it's incitement, and maybe "incitement" should be expanded due to the Internet. You're not condoning killing people over a video but you do place making a video on the same level as murder. You claim some belief in free speech but find the Constitution to be pretty much useless as used toilet paper because the framers were horrible, evil people. I tell you that you're arguing just to argue, you deny that but then admit to someone else that you're just playing devil's advocate. It really looks to me that you're taking positions you know will get the most rise out of people while throwing out little digs about things going over people's heads, statements being "libelous" (I laughed) and telling certain people not to even talk to you - there's an Internet term for people who post as you have in this thread.that's why I keep asking people to read what I write carefully.
By the way; I notice you failed to dredge up a contradiction from my posts! I cheerfully accept your failure to back up your libelous statement as your de facto concession on this point.