Again, it boils down to common sense. You don't make a movie like that and release it publicly knowing that it will cause violent outrage. It's a thin line to walk, I admit that. But you have to ask yourself, at what point does it stop being art? We don't consider child porn as art. We don't consider racial violence videos as art. We shouldn't consider this art either.
Scientific fact: If you took all of the veins from your body and laid them end to end, you would die.
You argument is unsound all on its own. In pointing out that TV is also paid for I am pointing out that your argument is also logically invalid.
Your distinction is neither a real distinction nor, should we grant a distinction arguendo, is the distinction a meaningful one.
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)