• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2012 Fantasy Voting Booth

Vote your conscience

  • Total voters
    46
Why do I get a feeling this poll isnt going the way he intended :)
 
Dragonfly said:
Worst "fantasy" poll ever.

Where are the other options?

I can think of at least 6, maybe more options that should be included on this poll.

Not to mention "I will not vote at all" and "other" for write-in considerations.



Huntsman
Bachmann
Gingrich
H. Clinton
Perry
Santorum
Trump
Nader
Johnson

??????????
Click to expand...

What about the Cain train!?
 
ann_stephen_colbert_herman_cain_ad_ll_120117_wblog.jpg

Hop aboard the Cain train!
 
Cardinal said:
I'm really curious who Cpwill thinks is holding his leash. He seemed to consider it a pretty good reason for voting for him over Obama. I'm surprised he hasn't answered already -- he had to know that somebody on this forum would ask him that.
Click to expand...

I thought I did. The conservative movement, best represented by the Tea Party, holds the leash.
 
See, my voting booth fantasy is when I walk out the door, instead of a sticker saying I voted, I would instead receive a massive blueberry muffin.
 
Fiddytree said:
See, my voting booth fantasy is when I walk out the door, instead of a sticker saying I voted, I would instead receive a massive blueberry muffin.
Click to expand...

My fantasy would involve Selma Hayek and some physical interaction of an intimate nature. As a reward for voting of course.....
 
Dragonfly said:
My fantasy would involve Selma Hayek and some physical interaction of an intimate nature. As a reward for voting of course.....
Click to expand...

Voter intimidation "done right"? :D
 
lpast said:
Why do I get a feeling this poll isnt going the way he intended :)
Click to expand...

According to the little symbol, skitzo is a she.

And boy oh boy.....she sure is quiet now isn't she? :2wave:
 
Dragonfly said:
According to the little symbol, skitzo is a she.

And boy oh boy.....she sure is quiet now isn't she? :2wave:
Click to expand...


Actually, no. I'm busy starting other threads trying to raise awareness. Paul has pretty much given up and so the enthusiasm has dwindled sIt has even been suggested that Paul didn't really want to be president because he knew if he did get elected, he would be assassinated.
 
sKiTzo said:
Actually, no. I'm busy starting other threads trying to raise awareness. Paul has pretty much given up and so the enthusiasm has dwindled sIt has even been suggested that Paul didn't really want to be president because he knew if he did get elected, he would be assassinated.
Click to expand...

You take information from Alex Jones? Awesome.
 
Fiddytree said:
You take information from Alex Jones? Awesome.
Click to expand...

I never mentioned alex jones. In fact, I try to steer clear from sourcing my info there since whenever his name comes up, it appears the general consensus doesn't take him seriously. Although I'm not of that general consensus, I don't think I've ever used info from him as a source in any of my posts on DP. Always try to verify the info no matter where it's from and then be sure you don't reject information because it disturbs your reality bubble. I find a lot of people here tend to have that problem.
 
Ron Paul isn't even the Libertarian candidate...Gary Johnson is and that is who gets my vote.
 
sKiTzo said:
I never mentioned alex jones. In fact, I try to steer clear from sourcing my info there since whenever his name comes up, it appears the general consensus doesn't take him seriously. Although I'm not of that general consensus, I don't think I've ever used info from him as a source in any of my posts on DP. Always try to verify the info no matter where it's from and then be sure you don't reject information because it disturbs your reality bubble. I find a lot of people here tend to have that problem.
Click to expand...

Well, I had a hard time finding anyone who wasn't Alex Jones' interview laying the groundwork for the hint that Ron Paul was receiving death threats and that contributed to his ending moments for the campaign. Excuse me for suggesting that this sounds unrealistic and that the only person promoting the idea believed the U.S. Government perpetrated 9/11.
 
Last edited:
Dragonfly said:
Lol.....this comedy never ends....
Click to expand...

you have him confused with Colin Powell
and in the interest of clarity, it was Alma Powell, not Colin, who was fearful he would be assassinated
 
Paul. Obama doesn't deserve another term, and Romney is not the solution. All Paul supporters who vote Romney will receive a major shock if Romney is elected.
 
It is unkind of me to point out that Ron Paul is NOT running for President?

If we're just fantasizing, I suggest Specklebang for President. He's 10 times smarter than any of the 2 clowns being offered. If not Specklebang, how about Johnson. At least he's on the ballot.
 
rocket88 said:
(like returning to the gold standard) are a recipe for disaster economically.
Click to expand...

-Unless I'm mistaken, the gold standard is what prevented them from being able to just print more money as long as they had ink and paper, as well as preventing loans that were just created by entering a few numbers into a computer and then sit back and watch the payments roll in. The gold standard made it so that, monetarily speaking, everything was tangible. The disaster came about after the gold standard was done away with.
 
The people should file a class-action lawsuit against the banks: Show proof that they have assets and hard cash greater than or equal to the amount of loans they have out. If they can't, all loans are nullified.
 
... which will never happen, because then every single loan would be nullified -- which is secondary to the fact that the suit would have no basis whatsoever in law.
 
If I had to pick from the three listed I would choose Ron Paul. I would prefer Gary Johnson for social issues, just because he seems to lean farther left than Dr. Paul.
 
cpwill said:
1. Obama is destructive
2. Paul is insane
3. Romney will at least do what he is told
Click to expand...

Clinton did what he was told to do by watching polls and that worked economically but we need an actual leader. The public was against pursuing terrorism so Clinton dropped the ball on that.
 
sKiTzo said:
-Unless I'm mistaken, the gold standard is what prevented them from being able to just print more money as long as they had ink and paper, as well as preventing loans that were just created by entering a few numbers into a computer and then sit back and watch the payments roll in. The gold standard made it so that, monetarily speaking, everything was tangible. The disaster came about after the gold standard was done away with.
Click to expand...

Maybe getting off the gold standard was the wrong move when it happened, but a return to it would result in absolute financial panic as most Americans watch their savings dwindle to a fraction of what they were.

The result would be chaos and disaster on many different levels.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom