Seems ryan has given romney a boost. See cpwill I can admit it I just read Romney took the lead in Ohio, Fla and Wisconsin all big swing states in a quinnipiac poll which seem to be fair minded pollsters.
Quinnipiac: Obama Leading in Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin
There is also the a famously accurate poll model that predicts Presidential winners having romny as winning in nov...using thier model they have been 100% accurate since 1980 in predicting the winner.
Analysis of election factors points to Romney win, University of Colorado study says | University of Colorado Boulder
Do you believe Obama or Romney will win in Nov....I still believe the debates can turn the tide and firmly place the winner, however, going into the debates Romny/Ryan have a clear edge.
Will what your forgetting or omitting is that romney did TERRIBLE in every debate and thats not my statement that foxnews critiques and everyone else...he did lousy in debates...his salvation he was up against mostly total tards like bachman and the 999 pizza moron and ron paul who it wouldnt get him elected if he came out #1 every debate...
and yes you give the aura you worshop paul ryan
you accuse us of alot of things for one we wouldnt admit if ryan gave him a boost...but its pretty clear you dont find a single thing wrong with ryan or what he says buddy Ryan aint all that either
Firstly, other than the original poster you two are the only ones posting. The poll was "Who do you think will win" not "I believe they are both philosophically mute."
Secondly it all really depends on Ohio. But I still say Obama.
Seems ryan has given romney a boost. See cpwill I can admit it I just read Romney took the lead in Ohio, Fla and Wisconsin all big swing states in a quinnipiac poll which seem to be fair minded pollsters.
Quinnipiac: Obama Leading in Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin
There is also the a famously accurate poll model that predicts Presidential winners having romny as winning in nov...using thier model they have been 100% accurate since 1980 in predicting the winner.
Analysis of election factors points to Romney win, University of Colorado study says | University of Colorado Boulder
Do you believe Obama or Romney will win in Nov....I still believe the debates can turn the tide and firmly place the winner, however, going into the debates Romny/Ryan have a clear edge.
Sorry, it's just frustrating that everybody thinks there is a choice. Romney is a fraudulent nominee. Both him and Obama are threats to our livelihood. Everybody is so duped by the media, it's sickening.
Haymarket a couple of henny youngman jokes...the old fashioned kind with no sex or swearing in them...
FUNNY2™ - Henny Youngman Jokes #1
Obviously you have never taken that oath, or any oath like it. If you had than you would know that it is more than just words.I'm not sure if that is more of a dream or a reality, but I'm leaning heavily towards a dream. I think its a magical thought to think the men and women that choose to join the military ranks will not simply gun us down if ordered to do so, and I can't think of any sort of substantial history to back up these claims they wouldn't. The truth is the government would jail and kill them if they said no and I doubt they are unaware of such truths. I think as soon as any sort of problems arose our men and women would start getting jailed and charged with treason and in no time flat the problems would simply disappear in the military ranks.
I just don't see this making any sort of difference at all. Oaths themselves have never shown themselves to be anything more than words.
I don't know about all of that. People are getting what they are asking for and sadly they are asking for scum. What they want done takes a certain type of person and sadly that person is a scumbag. It will always be like this for the demands that they have and until they change those demands they will not get better choices.
Eh scumbag is a bit harsh, but I agree with the sentiment that we get what we ask for in a politician.I don't know about all of that. People are getting what they are asking for and sadly they are asking for scum. What they want done takes a certain type of person and sadly that person is a scumbag. It will always be like this for the demands that they have and until they change those demands they will not get better choices.
We all lose no matter who wins.
Bachman was a bit nutty and Cain didn't belong on the stage. Perry was the guy who was horrible at debates, though. Romney simply wasn't as good as Gingrich. Which is to say, he wasn't as good as one of the greatest public debaters currently speaking. Gingrich's problem isn't that he isn't smart or can't think on his feet - it is that he is a hypocrite, flighty, and tends to become a bombastic demagogue.
As for Romney v Obama; I see that coming out as probably a tie. Either might make a major slip-up, but you can't plan on either doing so. Both men have run tightly disciplined campaigns, and will probably continue to do so.
No. the only entity worthy of worship is God.
On the contrary, I have criticized Ryan for supporting the original auto bailouts and for failing to push forward support for Social Security reform. It's just that, among our political class, Ryan is the best that we currently have when it comes to avoiding our looming fiscal crises.
I voted that I think Obama will win. But he'll have to do it knowing that I'll be voting for Romney. I actually think it's going to be a horse race. I'm eagerly awaiting the October surprises.
If there was one single reason why Reagan was so popular, it was because he was more of one of us then one of them. Listening to his speeches, he always had that presence. I work for the American citizens, they are my boss and I represent them. A government as a whole should not have to physically fear its people, but I would at least hope that more elected officials fear losing their jobs if they stop working for the people. Too many are in for too long, not that I favor term limits. I actually do not. I feel that if there is a represetative that does a great job for their community and is well liked, they should go on serving. The term limits should be based on job performance.They are just not us. They are them and we are us. That is how it is. They are the citizens that rule over everyone else while we are the ones being ruled. I don't think you can actually get around that. I have seen plenty tell me, but we elect them, but that means nothing to my fact that I presented. All it means is we have input on who rules us, but it doesn't even explore the amount of input that gives or the amount of choices it provides nor does it actually even face the reality that they are still ruling over everyone else. Its basically like saying if you are hired onto a company and you get a vote on who the ceo is that you are the ceo. It makes no sense. Obviously you are not the CEO and obviously he has the power to run the company and has your job in his hands. All dreams and fairytales aside that is how it is. I do see how that is libertarian belief, but I surely see how that is basic reality that is inescapable.
Anyway, this whole idea of making them scared of us is built on a false premise pretty much. Its assuming we have the power to make them scared or threaten them and that we hold more might over them at any point in time. The fact is they could wipe us off the planet whenever they felt like it and we gave them that power long ago and did so over and over again throughout centuries of time. You want to deny these facts, go right ahead, but the military might says otherwise. It would be wonderful if they were scared of us, but that doesn't happen all that often and its not happening now.