I don't FAIL to answer...I dismiss crazy taxer bull****. That's all you got, dude.
Again, not my fault you have no grasp of the topic at hand.
Do you even know what UBS is? I seriously doubt it.
Again, you're the one arguing it is normal for campaigns to help their opponents spread dirty rumors about themselves.
Not me. I'm in fact saying that's WHY Romney has something worse.
You seem to think it's normal campaign behavior to help your opponents tear your own candidate down.
You guys aren't smart enough to figure out when to quit.
This coming from a guy who thinks its normal for campaigns to actively help their opponents spread dirty rumors about their own candidate.
And here is YOUR brand of stupid, crazy taxer talk...and you keep repeating it. Evidently, you think that if you keep saying it...it'll someday be true. It won't.
The rest of your screed is nothing more than liberal taxer bull****. You know, a whole bunch of Bain and Romney financial records have been hacked and release a couple of days ago. That means y'all have had two days to look for something damaging. LOL!! Since then...nothing. That should tell you something, don't you think? Heck, even Obama's campaign has stopped making a big deal about Romney's tax records.
You got nothing...and that bugs the **** out of you.
Look "Mr. I think Yelling makes a good argument,"
I pointed out how Romney's steadfast refusal casts suspicion. I pointed out how there is really only 1 scandal within 2009 that is of any real material. I pointed out how Romney's refusal actively helps the Obama campaign tear down Romney and cast him as dishonest, secretive and unwilling to be frank with America.
You, however, have not even shown you even understand what a tax scandal is. You have redefined what a taxer is to include anyone who even THINKS there is something questionable in Romney's returns. I'm not calling for Romney to release. In fact, I
have repetitively stated I agree with his stance NOT to release concerning the likelihood of a UBS scandal. You haven't even shown you know what UBS is.
Where birthers are based on an inherent dislike of Obama, I'm merely pointing out that Romney is actively helping Obama's rumor on him. I also pointed out the timeframe in question and the sole real scandal.
You seem to think it's all crazy for people to think that Romney has something in the return that's bad. And you are
entirely unwilling to even attempt to answer my question about when was the last time you saw a campaign that actively helped its opponent spread a dirty rumor about itself for so long.
That leads me to believe you think it's normal for campaigns to help their opponents in tearing themselves down.
That leads me to believe you are insanely partisan.
I agree with Romney not to release. The Democrats would have a field day if the UBS scandal got out. Much better for people to think he paid little legally.