This.Originally Posted by Surtr
I sure won't do like America did in 2008 by collectively proving they're not racist and apologetically electing an underqualified black man for president.
I'd vote for a woman, but she better have a damn good reason to get my vote besides "she's a woman". America done screwed itself already with that line of thought.
Would you vote for a woman if she was going to strike down women's access to the political process?
gender doesn't play a role in my voting decisions. i vote for the candidate whose views most closely resemble my own.
I love the NSA. It's like having a secret fan-base you will never see, but they're there, watching everything you write and it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside knowing that I may be some person's only form of unconstitutional entertainment one night.
I'm not sure why he doesn't move to Iran, a country that comes much closer to espousing his ideals and beliefs. Over there, women are 4th class citizens, below the dog and the camel.
I'd vote for a woman. The problem with the poll is it doesn't really give a good option. I vote for the best qualified candidate, entirely without regard for gender, race or sexual orientation. I'll vote for the person best qualified to do the job, full stop. I wouldn't be happier to vote for a qualified woman than I would for an equally-qualified man, any more than I'd be happier to vote for a black man over a white man or an asian man. It's entirely irrelevant.