View Poll Results: Which is more reprehensible?

Voters
59. You may not vote on this poll
  • Earning more than $1,000,000 annually

    2 3.39%
  • Intentionally living off welfare

    57 96.61%
Page 7 of 16 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 160

Thread: Which is more reprehensible?

  1. #61
    Sage
    Cephus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    CA
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    29,751

    Re: Which is more reprehensible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dittohead not! View Post
    Force them to be responsible?

    How?
    Chemically or surgically fix the parents so they cannot breed again. Make them entirely ineligible for welfare. Take the kid away forever and make them provide 25% of their income for the next 18 years for it's support.
    There is nothing demonstrably true that religion can provide the world that cannot be achieved more rationally through entirely secular means.

    Blog me! YouTube me! VidMe me!

  2. #62
    Sage
    Cephus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    CA
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    29,751

    Re: Which is more reprehensible?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist View Post
    That's why rational people are both pro-choice and pro-responsibility.
    There is nothing demonstrably true that religion can provide the world that cannot be achieved more rationally through entirely secular means.

    Blog me! YouTube me! VidMe me!

  3. #63
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last Seen
    10-28-17 @ 06:19 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    15,248

    Re: Which is more reprehensible?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheLastIndependent View Post
    I know quite a few welfare recipients that hide the fact that they work so that they can have enough money to pay for necessities. The problem with welfare is that it is taken away in whole and the people are not weened off. Welfare is not wealthy living
    And you've reported these people, of course.
    "Groups with guitars are on the way out, Mr. Epstein"

    Dick Rowe, A & R man
    Decca Records
    London, 1962

  4. #64
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Seen
    09-10-12 @ 12:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    317

    Re: Which is more reprehensible?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheLastIndependent View Post
    Obviously intentionally living on welfare. But tell me, what percentage of welfare recipients do you think intentionally live on it?
    My guess is at least 50%.

  5. #65
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Republic of Texas.
    Last Seen
    11-15-17 @ 11:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,647

    Re: Which is more reprehensible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cephus View Post
    That's why rational people are both pro-choice and pro-responsibility.
    No, rational people are Pro-life and believe in adopting children out to responsible parents. All welfare recipients should have their children taken away and either raised by good parents or in properly managed group homes.

    Placing welfare children in a group home run by Nuns and Marine DIs would be much better for the children and cheaper for society.

  6. #66
    Sage
    Cephus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    CA
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    29,751

    Re: Which is more reprehensible?

    Quote Originally Posted by DVSentinel View Post
    No, rational people are Pro-life and believe in adopting children out to responsible parents.
    When you come up with enough qualified adoptive parents to handle the unwanted children we already have, be sure to let me know. They just don't exist.

    All welfare recipients should have their children taken away and either raised by good parents or in properly managed group homes.
    I think that while on welfare, there needs to be a strict no-breeding clause. You will absolutely not make a penny more if you have any more kids while on welfare. I'm cool with all kids taken from welfare mothers if they have any more kids while on the public dole.

    Placing welfare children in a group home run by Nuns and Marine DIs would be much better for the children and cheaper for society.
    The last thing we need is more mind poison being spread to the next generation.
    There is nothing demonstrably true that religion can provide the world that cannot be achieved more rationally through entirely secular means.

    Blog me! YouTube me! VidMe me!

  7. #67
    Sage
    Phys251's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:57 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    12,707

    Re: Which is more reprehensible?

    Quote Originally Posted by DVSentinel View Post
    Not sure what your trying to say, but if you really want, I will change my previous statement to:

    Welfare as it exist in America today should not exist.

    It is illogical to use limited resourses to maintain intentionally non-productive members of our society or to limit the negative affects of poor choices. Workfare, not welfare, is the only logical choice as it makes all participating in it to make positive contributions to society.
    Thank you for supporting the claim that the Far Right firmly believes in karma.
    "A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man we can trust with nuclear weapons." --Hillary Rodham Clinton
    "Innocent until proven guilty is for criminal convictions, not elections." --Mitt Romney

  8. #68
    Sage
    jamesrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A place where common sense exists
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    31,067

    Re: Which is more reprehensible?

    Quote Originally Posted by ksu_aviator View Post
    To you, which is more reprehensible?
    Legally earning money is not reprehensible. The only one that is actually reprehensible is intentionally living off welfare. What I mean by intentionally I mean popping out more kids than you can afford to take care of on your own and not using any opportunity to get a better job, Not someone who has fallen on hard times has to use public assistance in order to get back on their feet.
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"

    Cicero Marcus Tullius

  9. #69
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Republic of Texas.
    Last Seen
    11-15-17 @ 11:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,647

    Re: Which is more reprehensible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cephus View Post
    The last thing we need is more mind poison being spread to the next generation.
    How is that poisoning the minds of the next generation? It gives them a balance between compassion and discipline, also good physical fitness habits for life. Ok, replace the nuns with compassionate women who will give them the love they need (that way they won't be encouraged to be catholic). Besides, they would have chores to do, so they learn good work habits. Older children can do the cooking with guidence, everyone should learn to cook. From around the age of 11 on, they provide most of the needs the infants when not in class. After changing dirty diapers and trying to calm squalling babies, knowing that babies are created by having sex, I bet far fewer of them will be sneaking off to have a roll in the hay. The discipline they learn will help them in all things in life and help them not only be better educated and better citizens but will help them reach their potential.

  10. #70
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Republic of Texas.
    Last Seen
    11-15-17 @ 11:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,647

    Re: Which is more reprehensible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Phys251 View Post
    Thank you for supporting the claim that the Far Right firmly believes in karma.
    Your welcome, but for what I am not for sure, as I am no where near "Far Right".

Page 7 of 16 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •