• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans who voted in your state primary/caucus

Republican primary/caucus - who got your vote?

  • Santorum

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Gingrich

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Romney

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Paul

    Votes: 2 100.0%
  • Total voters
    2
sKiTzo

sKiTzo

DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,671
Reaction score
535
Location
OC California
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
We're trying to settle a bet. If you are Republican and you voted in your state primary/caucus, who got your vote?Thanks for participating.
 
Last edited:
Where's Bachmann? Perry? Other?

For anybody brave/stupid enough to come into YET ANOTHER poll about this election cycle, the "bet" is that Romney is fraudulently (and illegally) being driven to the nomination by party leaders within the Republican party.

SkitZo (op) believes Ron Paul has actually gotten the overwhelming majority of the popular vote, but is being black-balled by his own party in favor of Romney.
 
Jon Huntsman
 
Dragonfly said:
Where's Bachmann? Perry? Other?

For anybody brave/stupid enough to come into YET ANOTHER poll about this election cycle, the "bet" is that Romney is fraudulently (and illegally) being driven to the nomination by party leaders within the Republican party.

SkitZo (op) believes Ron Paul has actually gotten the overwhelming majority of the popular vote, but is being black-balled by his own party in favor of Romney.
Click to expand...

2 votes. Both for Ron Paul.
My other poll: Paul - 9 Romney - 0
Your poll - 0 people checked the box that they voted for Romney but don't suspect fraud..

I know it doesn't mean anything but if I had to bet based on this, I'm gonna go with the 100%.
 
It's been mildly entertaining playing with you for the last week or two, but now it's just becoming sad.

Take this and carry on without me.

tin-foil_365.jpg


Please - enjoy your stay here.....:beatdeadhorse
 
Dragonfly said:
It's been mildly entertaining playing with you for the last week or two, but now it's just becoming sad.

Take this and carry on without me.

tin-foil_365.jpg


Please - enjoy your stay here.....:beatdeadhorse
Click to expand...

We already agreed that there wasn't enough votes to make this conclusive. So why get all mad and storm out? As far as a good "cross section". the fact that I have no idea who voted and I posted it here where it's pretty random, makes it a cross section that may or may not be a good enough cross section, but it is nevertheless, a cross section.

So yes, while it may have been inconclusive , I don't know how anybody wouldn't agree that the few results reflected should have at least been enough for you to say that you COULD be wrong, but you wouldn't even do that. If you are going to debate politics, what's the point if you are going to "bail out" not even when you're wrong, but just when it looks like you COULD be wrong. This makes me think that if you were actually proven full-fledged wrong, you would just go on in total denial pretending you're right (kinda like what you're doing now). That's not for the greater good. Hell, I was ready to do this same poll and find somewhere that would yield 100's of votes but if you're really going to take off just when things get interesting, I guess Quag and Gaze At The Blue can be your relief pitchers. We'll put you on the injured list , hence. the old cliche - "truth hurts".
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom