• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nationwide Voter Fraud Within Republican Party - 2012

Is the republican party fraudulently/illegally forcing Romney to be the nominee?

  • Yes - I believe voter fraud is rampant within the RP

    Votes: 2 5.9%

  • No - Nothing illegal has taken place with the RP regarding Romney's nomination

    Votes: 6 17.6%

  • Yes - I wear a tinfoil hat

    Votes: 2 5.9%

  • No - I do not like Romney, but I believe he's won nomination legally

    Votes: 11 32.4%

  • I did not vote for Romney, but I don't think anything illegal has helped him win nomination

    Votes: 9 26.5%

  • I did vote for Romney, and I don't think anything illegal helped him win nomination

    Votes: 1 2.9%

  • other - please explain

    Votes: 3 8.8%
  • Total voters
    34
Tooth Fairy
Santa Claus
Easter Bunny
"Massive Voter Fraud" committed by The People, whether they be legal citizens or not - As Claimed by A Political Party

People, people, people. We live in an era where government corruption is flagrant. Politicians are completely shameless. The media has been bought out by corporations that value money more than truth, justice, and freedom. And there's many more people, by leaps and bounds, who are dumber than a bucket of spit, than there are individual people who are compulsively driven to commit voter fraud.
 
Not voter fraud by "the people" - voter fraud by the party.

Or - specifically, by the people that run the party.
 
jambalaya said:
Come back to us when you have a better source than SOME PEOPLE.
Click to expand...

I'm not suggesting this kind of gross violation is currently in practice by the Reps.

I'm asking if the collective membership of DP thinks it's currently in practice.

Some here do. Some don't.

What ratio does, compared to what ratio doesn't.
 
sKiTzo said:
Look at the poll above. how many voted for Romney, the guy who "WON" the nomination?
Click to expand...

grasping-at-straws1.jpg
 
Dragonfly said:
I'm not suggesting this kind of gross violation is currently in practice by the Reps.

I'm asking if the collective membership of DP thinks it's currently in practice.

Some here do. Some don't.

What ratio does, compared to what ratio doesn't.
Click to expand...

Yes, I'd also like to know how many DP members automatically believe things they read online, with absolutely nothing to back them up.

(Raise your hand if you believe everything you hear, so I know not to waste my time debating with you in the future. Thanks much.)

I used to pretty active in the RNC, and their process was damn near infallable. I had to show legal ID many times, for one thing. Most of the folks working in the voting process were librarians and bank tellers and such, and background checks were performed. I don't know where you're getting your information, but I'm guessing you didn't supply any source for this assertion because people would laugh at you. You're probably right.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm busy starting my own poll: How Many People Think Obama Still Eats Dogs?
 
GJ Flash said:
Yes, I'd also like to know how many DP members automatically believe things they read online, with absolutely nothing to back them up.

(Raise your hand if you believe everything you hear, so I know not to waste my time debating with you in the future. Thanks much.)

I used to pretty active in the RNC, and their process was damn near infallable. I had to show legal ID many times, for one thing. Most of the folks working in the voting process were librarians and bank tellers and such, and background checks were performed. I don't know where you're getting your information, but I'm guessing you didn't supply any source for this assertion because people would laugh at you. You're probably right.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm busy starting my own poll: How Many People Think Obama Still Eats Dogs?
Click to expand...

I asked the question because somebody else here asserted that rampant fraud was alive and well among the leadership of the Republican party. They asserted that Romney was NOT the popular choice, and that in fact he was being illegally and fraudulently planted by the leaders of the party.

I stated simply that this person was a tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist, and then got told I was eating the same crap as most of the population because I believed what the media fed me.

So I took matters into my own hands and created a poll to see how many people feel that there's a high level of unconstitutional and illegal fraud running amuck within the Republican party.

I will assume you believe no such thing exists. Which means we both generally agree with each other.
 
Dragonfly said:
It's been claimed here (DP) that voter fraud has run amuck within the Republican party.

The claim is that Romney is not the popular favorite among the registered, voting republicans/conservatives.

The claim is that some other candidate is actually much more popular, and has received more votes than Romney (or any other candidate), but that the republican party leaders have ignored and falsified votes in order to "plant" Romney as the victor.

So my question to you Republicans/Conservatives is this:

Has massive, nationwide voter fraud taken place during this election cycle with a focused effort on placing Romney as the winner at the expense of any and all other candidates?
Click to expand...


Ron Paul delegates disqualified from the RNC - YouTube

Replacing delegates because they wouldn't perjure themselves. Does this leave any doubts?
 
Blackdog said:
What? It's the RNC. They can pretty much make up the rules as they go along and it is not anything illegal. Unless you wear a tinfoil hat I guess. :doh
Click to expand...

My particular "tin foil" argument is not so much whether it is legal or not, but that Paul would win if they didn't "pretty much make up the rules as they go along". Proof that I'm right is default in that if I wasn't they wouldn't HAVE to "pretty much make up the rules as they go along", they would just stay out of it and let Romney win the RIGHT way.
 
sKiTzo said:
My particular "tin foil" argument is not so much whether it is legal or not, but that Paul would win if they didn't "pretty much make up the rules as they go along". Proof that I'm right is default in that if I wasn't they wouldn't HAVE to "pretty much make up the rules as they go along", they would just stay out of it and let Romney win the RIGHT way.
Click to expand...

OK, I guess I can see your point. Although I do like Ron Paul, he would never win because the media makes him a joke. It is unfortunate and stupid, but what can ya do?

Carry on. lol.
 
There are so many better uses for tin foil:

tinhead.jpg


Please stop feeding the critters with it.....Once they find a source of food they'll incessantly post the same crap in dozens of different ways hoping to generate some support for their wildly manic thoughts.

The sadness involved in watching them post numerous threads in multiple sub-forums asking the same thing over and over again becomes difficult to watch. Especially once the general membership has labeled them for what they are. We all tend to just shy away as if it's an infectious disease that nobody wishes to catch.

Ron Paul has limited popularity and the reason why it's limited has NOTHING to do with some media or party conspiracy to keep him underground.

Ron Paul is not ultra-popular for the same reasons that Gingrich, Bachmann, Perry, Huntsman, Santorum, Trump, and a whole host of others were not ultra-popular.

Please - hide your tin foil and move along. There have now been about a dozen threads specific to the idea that unconstitutional and illegal maneuvering by the Republican Party has been perpetrated against the American people.

It's unsupported and generally scoffed at by most.

For a very good reason.
 
The republicans and all those that are looking to vote the current president out only chose Romney for one reason; he is the most “safe” choice for a candidate.

There was no fraud, although there was skullduggery.

If given the choice of who they want for president (would be the best man for the job) Romney would not be the choice for candidate. Romney looked like the best chance to beat Obama for the simple fact that he is vanilla ice-cream. He is the hardest to make look like a raving psychopath. But the democrats will do their best.
 
sKiTzo said:
My particular "tin foil" argument is not so much whether it is legal or not, but that Paul would win if they didn't "pretty much make up the rules as they go along". Proof that I'm right is default in that if I wasn't they wouldn't HAVE to "pretty much make up the rules as they go along", they would just stay out of it and let Romney win the RIGHT way.
Click to expand...
Ron Paul would never win the Republican Party nomination for one simple reason, his statement that the terrorist are angry because of what WE have done.
Some libertarians and maybe a lot of democrats would agree with that statement but the republicans and conservatives, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
 
comedy4all said:
Ron Paul would never win the Republican Party nomination for one simple reason, his statement that the terrorist are angry because of what WE have done.
Some libertarians and maybe a lot of democrats would agree with that statement but the republicans and conservatives, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Click to expand...

That would not be true. I know, I am conservative like many other who know this is true.

Untrue blanket statements are just lies on a much larger scale.
 
Last edited:
Blackdog said:
Untrue blanket statements are just lies on a much larger scale.
Click to expand...

You mean like saying that "most registered republicans actually voted for Ron Paul, but the Republican Party has falsified results and proclaimed that Romney is the winner"?
 
Dragonfly said:
You mean like saying that "most registered republicans actually voted for Ron Paul, but the Republican Party has falsified results and proclaimed that Romney is the winner"?
Click to expand...

Exactly.

1234
 
Dragonfly said:
There are so many better uses for tin foil:

tinhead.jpg


Please stop feeding the critters with it.....Once they find a source of food they'll incessantly post the same crap in dozens of different ways hoping to generate some support for their wildly manic thoughts.

The sadness involved in watching them post numerous threads in multiple sub-forums asking the same thing over and over again becomes difficult to watch. Especially once the general membership has labeled them for what they are. We all tend to just shy away as if it's an infectious disease that nobody wishes to catch.

Ron Paul has limited popularity and the reason why it's limited has NOTHING to do with some media or party conspiracy to keep him underground.

Ron Paul is not ultra-popular for the same reasons that Gingrich, Bachmann, Perry, Huntsman, Santorum, Trump, and a whole host of others were not ultra-popular.

Please - hide your tin foil and move along. There have now been about a dozen threads specific to the idea that unconstitutional and illegal maneuvering by the Republican Party has been perpetrated against the American people.

It's unsupported and generally scoffed at by most.

For a very good reason.
Click to expand...

Scoff all you want. You continue to say Ron Paul has less support than Romney but the actions of the party are not consistent with the idea that Romney has more support. Ron Paul was the only candidate left. Just him and Romney. They are replacing all Ron Paul delegates with Romney delegates because Paul delegates refused to sign an affidavit saying they will vote for Romney. Isn't that election fraud? Last I checked, party officials weren't allowed to coerce delegates by forcing them to vote for a pre-chosen candidate, and then disqualify them for supporting the candidate of their choice. No, that is definitely election fraud. They are risking alot. For one thing, they have let the world know just how they operate. The show of dishonesty will prove devastating in the long run, and in doing this, they have pretty much guaranteed a second term for Obama.

It's an all or nothing desparate move - and because why? Because Paul does not command a majority if the votes were actually counted and the results were reported truthfully? They know this isn't the primaries anymore and they won't be able to manipulate the results. So when I say THEIR own actions are what is proving you wrong. You can't argue unless you're going to say these things aren't taking place.

So Romney will look better going up against Obama? A man who "bypassed" the election process and making a mockery of it is better than Ron Paul because Paul wears tin foil hats?
 
Dragonfly said:
I never once said anything about RP wearing tinfoil.

:lamo:lol::2rofll::2funny:
Click to expand...

RP is the only candidate with an international following. People in other countries are concerned because even they can see what you're not seeing, and they know it's going to affect the whole world too - not just us. Romney and Obama are not going to do anything fpr our benefit. They will do whatever the military industrial complex tells them to do. What they're going to do is step it up - world domination! They're out of control. RP was our last chance and we blew it. You're gonna see all this sht go down and you'll wonder why you didn't do anything...
 
sKiTzo said:
RP is the only candidate with an international following. People in other countries are concerned because even they can see what you're not seeing, and they know it's going to affect the whole world too - not just us. Romney and Obama are not going to do anything fpr our benefit. They will do whatever the military industrial complex tells them to do. What they're going to do is step it up - world domination! They're out of control. RP was our last chance and we blew it. You're gonna see all this sht go down and you'll wonder why you didn't do anything...
Click to expand...


I am not a registered republican. I can't do sh!t about RP getting the nomination.

If RP is so popular why doesn't he go rouge and quit the party that's "illegally preventing him from being nominated"?
Why doesn't he file charges against the party?

Why doesn't he step up and proclaim the same nutty crap you do?

And where is all your support here? Why haven't others here jumped on your bandwagon and supported your claims?

Why?

It's simple. You just refuse to see it.
 
Dragonfly said:
I am not a registered republican. I can't do sh!t about RP getting the nomination.

If RP is so popular why doesn't he go rouge and quit the party that's "illegally preventing him from being nominated"?
Why doesn't he file charges against the party?

Why doesn't he step up and proclaim the same nutty crap you do?

And where is all your support here? Why haven't others here jumped on your bandwagon and supported your claims?

Why?

It's simple. You just refuse to see it.
Click to expand...

There's a simple answer. It seems he did not fathom that the party would stoop so low, and be so scandalous as they've been. Myself, I had assumed there were laws in place to subvert this type of thing but I guess they are allowed to make up their own rules as they go because they are a "club". Now it's too late to go 3rd party (I think), is it?
 
sKiTzo said:
There's a simple answer. It seems he did not fathom that the party would stoop so low, and be so scandalous as they've been. Myself, I had assumed there were laws in place to subvert this type of thing but I guess they are allowed to make up their own rules as they go because they are a "club". Now it's too late to go 3rd party (I think), is it?
Click to expand...

You think one of the two nationally run parties can basically ignore the entire voting/election process, something that distinguishes our country from many others in the world, and just appoint their next candidate?????

And you think all the little lemmings within the party will accept that?

And you think all the little registered voter lemmings who belong to and donate money to the party will accept that?

Or - you're insinuating all the little voter lemmings are too stupid to see what's going on???? All except you? :lamo


If I start a thread about the "faked moon landing" will you drop this insanity and focus on something else?

090719-fake-moon-landing.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom