yep and I agree with that 100% in its essences.
I typically just say your rights end when they infringe on mine which is basically the same thing.
I just wish the system worked better and with more streamlines. Yes I dont went the fed to have to much control but the state shouldnt be able to make laws that drastically effect rights, freedom and liberty compared to other states.
IMO the gun law is an example of that, marriage law is an example of that, bank laws, hell even something as obscure as drug and prostitution laws. Its not that Im in favor or against these laws its that I understand that allowing just a state to do them or not to do them undermines the whole system because of their impact to individual and group freedom at the same time. TO me those things are on a national importance level because as a country they are tied directly to our freedoms, rights, liberty, constitution/Bill of rights etc etc
sometimes things take to long to bounce back and fourth or at the state level go to far.
examples of what I mean
Drivers license good everywhere in the nation and should be and overall controlled by fed. But one state might limit speed to 60 and another 75, another state might want you to have cars inspected and one not, im pretty ok with that.
My CWP SHOULD be legal through out the nation, the fact that its not is BS to me. This should be controlled by the fed but if individual states wanna say it needs renewed every 10 years or 5 or 3 whatever or I might even say its ok if states dont allowed concealed or make you wait till your 21 but open should be legal everywhere