Not really. I actually did a lot of that. Which I'm not proud of. But where I'm making amends and picking on people who actually deserve it.
eace
Note kiddies: This is what happens when a hackjob realizes he's getting his *** kicked. He starts making **** up to compensate for his lack of any skill whatsoever.
Look Kiddies: Cpwill is either missing the point or deliberately changing the topic. Did I argue any of that was wrong? No. I merely pointed out that under Reagan, debt financing spending stimulated the economy. Cpwill argues that it doesn't and its actually a drag on the economy. Then he proceeds here to try to find a exception that proves his stated belief isn't wrong in a way that doesn't force him to completely disavow Reagan.
Now, if Cpwill was honest (
which we all know he's completely not), he'd admit that debt financed spending can and has stimulated the economy, particularly during one the presidency of a President the GOP likes to consider the Ideal Conservative.
Yes, I'm smarter than you and we both know it.
So you're calling the
GOP Senate Minority leader,
Speaker of the House and
GOP House Majority leader not
Conservatives? They took part in the massive spending that stimulated the economy. Let's see just what level of absurdity you're willing to go to maintain the internal contradictions you hold.
I do agree with you on the Republicans =/= Conservatives. But some are.
No, I merely repeat the history of Human behavior. We say one thing but when our own personal interests are threaten, we change our tune and do what serves our interests the best. Or are you completely unaware of recorded human history as you are unaware of so many things?
Oh Look Kiddies: Cpwill is dancing around a question he does not want to answer. Everyone knows what you stated. But nothing you said addressed my point at all. Furthermore, from what we can see from your post, you are eluding to the notion that the GOP will let the economy go off a cliff merely to save their reelection chances but you seem to fail to understand the impact of a recession or a depression upon reelection chances.
So here's a tough question which I'm betting you simply do not have the courage to answer:
The GOP will let the economy go off a cliff rather than debt spend to prevent a massive recession?
Yes or no.
If you have the guts.
Which I seriously, seriously, seriously doubt you have.
Not when you understand how they did it. If German banks were forced to take the losses from their holdings quickly rather than have Merkel force austerity upon the nations in which they hold assets thereby granting them time to unwind their losses slowly and not at firesale prices and therefore avoid liquidity crisises within the German Banking system, they'd be in the same **** mess as the rest of Europe. Germany basically forced its pain on others so the German economy wouldn't have to suffer it. To some degree Germany is still paying for it via bailout funds, but that's very much more controlled then bank writeoffs reducing lending and liquidity within Germany. Someone made a **** load of money within the German government knowing just how long Germany would string Greece along.
Note: It actually helps to know what is happening, rather than to operate how you do.
Yes again, I'm smarter than you and we both know it.
Who doesn't love a recession at the same time as increasing deficits enacted by a plan that lied about getting deficits under control? Romney lost all economic credibility when he backed that pile of turd.
Actually I don't think stimulus is the answer. Furthermore, I have
repetitively said that stimulus cannot cure a financial recession (you choose to ignore it simply because you are incredibly dishonest). Furthermore, I have constantly pointed out that the real problem is the house hold debt, primarily mortgages and the concept of deleveraging that is killing the recovery. That said, the notion that stimulus can't stimulate is to ignore economic history from Day 1.
Making up more lies? Always fail? Really? Want to explain that to German in the 40s? How about Japan's Iron Triangle which directly lead to Japan becoming the 2nd largest economy (pre-contemporary China)?
You posted a study that outright explicitly said that non-fiscal factors were not included. And you expect to be taken seriously for that.
Thanks for proving you are in fact a liar. I never argued that it always works. I merely said that Kenysian does work. Does does not equate to always. I know you can read. That's why I call you a liar.
And I did this where? Considering the fact that you had to lie about what I said, you're on incredibly shaky ground.
And considering the fact that I have repetitively stated that stimulus spending cannot fix a fiscal crisis, you are even more on shaky ground.
Lying about what others said is a pretty poor argument tactic there Cpwill. But thanks for providing evidence about your honesty.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/history/70681-worst-presidents-all-time-51.html#post1059890996
Does that sound like I'm arguing stimulus always works?
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...630-tax-tsunami-horizon-7.html#post1058876674
Cpwill wrong AND a LIAR?
Whowouldthunk? Me actually.
Why do you keep pretending you are smarter and know more than I?