• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Question regarding HCR that is now in place?

Do you agree with the component of HCR that disallows rescission.


  • Total voters
    17
A victory today ... that for the 250 million of you that have insurance ... they cannot longer boot you off when you get sick or raise your premiums so they are no longer affordable!

We can now keep our children on our policies until they are 26 and through college and beginning jobs ...something that probably kept millions of young adults from being uninsured and save tax [payers millions in the event those uninsured would have had a catastrophic trauma or medical.

This was a victory for the citizens of the United States of America!

Video - Breaking News Videos from CNN.com
 
Would you like that taken back to 2008 where rescission was alive and well?

And this is the illogical, biased, slanted premise that you are expecting everyone to play under and is the reason you're not getting the reactions you want.

One can think that the overall act...the one that includes a ****ton more than just protection from rescission...needs to be stricken without thinking that the laws regarding health care as they were established in 2008 is what we need.

It is possible to believe there is good and merit worthy things in this law while still thinking the law as a whole is bad. The question is how much of the bad is bad, how much of the good is good, and how likely is the the good stuff in the law able to be maintained if you strip away the bad.

The option is not "This health care law" or "2008 law" and.....that's it.
 
This was a victory for the citizens of the United States of America!

Please, speak for yourself, for you surely do not speak for all citizens of the United States of America.
 
What?
Makes zero sense.

sure it does. health care has been improving. poor people today have better care then rich people had 30 years ago. this is the best example fo trickle down economics. Advancement in medicine is occurring at a rapid pace, and it is for the benefit of people of all social classes.

sometimes poor people just need to put things in perspective.
 
Back
Top Bottom