- Joined
- Mar 3, 2010
- Messages
- 60,458
- Reaction score
- 12,357
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Then let the owner produce whatever he wants without labor.
Or let him do the labor himself, in which case he also becomes the worker - I have no problem with that.
We already went over who owns what is produced and why so either refute it as a fact, make a case for why it is not justified or drop this.
Second, you're already getting paid for your labor to assist the owner in their business. You simply DO have to include yourself in another transaction and make a claim to property that is clearly already owned.