Poll: Texas secession?

Page 60 of 124 FirstFirst ... 1050585960616270110 ... LastLast
Results 591 to 600 of 1234
Like Tree272Likes

Thread: Texas secession?

  1. #591
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:34 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    11,097
    Likes Received
    2378 times
    Likes Given
    2707

    Re: Texas secession?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lokiate View Post
    The attack on Fort Sumter was a declaration of war.
    So basically it was act of war to take back what you own. D:

    Ok?
    Last edited by Henrin; 05-22-12 at 10:27 PM.

  2. #592
    versus the world
    Surtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    The Internets
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:37 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,273
    Likes Received
    2284 times
    Likes Given
    2015

    Re: Texas secession?

    Quote Originally Posted by Henrin View Post
    So basically it was act of war to back what you own. D:

    Ok?
    It was an act of war because they waged war against a US Military base. Should we have just let Peal Harbor and 9/11 slide, too?
    And the Earth died screaming...

  3. #593
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:34 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    11,097
    Likes Received
    2378 times
    Likes Given
    2707

    Re: Texas secession?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lokiate View Post
    It was an act of war because they waged war against a US Military base. Should we have just let Peal Harbor and 9/11 slide, too?
    Don't be daft. The only reason the North didn't leave the fort is because Lincoln needed an excuse to have his war so he dared the south to attack Fort Sumter by ignoring their request to leave the fort at once. He was told very clearly by his advisers this would lead to war, but since that is what he wanted he ignored his advisers and ordered the men to stay in the fort.

  4. #594
    versus the world
    Surtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    The Internets
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:37 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,273
    Likes Received
    2284 times
    Likes Given
    2015

    Re: Texas secession?

    Quote Originally Posted by Henrin View Post
    Don't be daft. The only reason the North didn't leave the fort is because Lincoln needed an excuse to have his war so he dared the south to attack Fort Sumter by ignoring their request to leave the fort at once. He was told very clearly by his advisers this would lead to war, but since that is what he wanted he ignored his advisers and ordered the men to stay in the fort.
    The Confederacy knew the consequences, and killed US Soldiers anyway. They brought it upon themselves.
    And the Earth died screaming...

  5. #595
    Global Moderator
    Basketball Nerd

    StillBallin75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Maryland
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    19,759
    Likes Received
    10894 times
    Likes Given
    12212

    Re: Texas secession?

    Quote Originally Posted by Henrin View Post
    Don't be daft. The only reason the North didn't leave the fort is because Lincoln needed an excuse to have his war so he dared the south to attack Fort Sumter by ignoring their request to leave the fort at once. He was told very clearly by his advisers this would lead to war, but since that is what he wanted he ignored his advisers and ordered the men to stay in the fort.
    This has got to be one of the dumbest things i've ever read on the forum. What is Lincoln supposed to order the US Army to do, just clear the **** out of Fort Sumter and let the South have their secession? The war was fought because one side sought to keep the Union together, while the other sought to divide it in two. Not because Lincoln was scheming for a civil war, but because the South knew that's what it would take to gain their own independence.
    Nobody who wins a war indulges in a bifurcated definition of victory. War is a political act; victory and defeat have meaning only in political terms. A country incapable of achieving its political objectives at an acceptable cost is losing the war, regardless of battlefield events.

    Bifurcating victory (e.g. winning militarily, losing politically) is a useful salve for defeated armies. The "stab in the back" narrative helped take the sting out of failure for German generals after WWI and their American counterparts after Vietnam.

    All the same, it's nonsense. To paraphrase Vince Lombardi, show me a political loser, and I'll show you a loser.
    - Colonel Paul Yingling

  6. #596
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:34 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    11,097
    Likes Received
    2378 times
    Likes Given
    2707

    Re: Texas secession?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lokiate View Post
    The Confederacy knew the consequences, and killed US Soldiers anyway. They brought it upon themselves.
    When you are ordered to leave property you do not own and you decide to stay you are giving your opponent no choice but to attack and kill you. Lincoln knew what was going to happen by ignoring the order and he still did it.
    Last edited by Henrin; 05-22-12 at 11:43 PM.

  7. #597
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:34 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    11,097
    Likes Received
    2378 times
    Likes Given
    2707

    Re: Texas secession?

    Quote Originally Posted by StillBallin75 View Post
    This has got to be one of the dumbest things i've ever read on the forum. What is Lincoln supposed to order the US Army to do, just clear the **** out of Fort Sumter and let the South have their secession? The war was fought because one side sought to keep the Union together, while the other sought to divide it in two. Not because Lincoln was scheming for a civil war, but because the South knew that's what it would take to gain their own independence.
    1. Leaving the union was NOT illegal.

    2. Lincoln was to respect that the fort was not his and the actions by the south were not illegal.

    3. He was to therefore leave the fort when ordered to do so.

    4. It is a fact that Lincoln needed to make the south look like the aggressor and there is no better way to do it than what he did.

  8. #598
    Sage
    winston53660's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:36 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    23,276
    Likes Received
    7769 times
    Likes Given
    2892

    Re: Texas secession?

    Hey how about the ask a Texan thread? see ya'll there.

  9. #599
    versus the world
    Surtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    The Internets
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:37 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,273
    Likes Received
    2284 times
    Likes Given
    2015

    Re: Texas secession?

    Quote Originally Posted by Henrin View Post
    When you are ordered to leave property you do not own and you decide to stay you are giving your opponent no choice but to attack and kill you. Lincoln knew what was going to happen by ignoring the order and he still did it.
    The Confederate states were, and still are property of the US government
    And the Earth died screaming...

  10. #600
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:34 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    11,097
    Likes Received
    2378 times
    Likes Given
    2707

    Re: Texas secession?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lokiate View Post
    The Confederate states were, and still are property of the US government
    And you got that from??

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •