

Don't be daft. The only reason the North didn't leave the fort is because Lincoln needed an excuse to have his war so he dared the south to attack Fort Sumter by ignoring their request to leave the fort at once. He was told very clearly by his advisers this would lead to war, but since that is what he wanted he ignored his advisers and ordered the men to stay in the fort.


This has got to be one of the dumbest things i've ever read on the forum. What is Lincoln supposed to order the US Army to do, just clear the **** out of Fort Sumter and let the South have their secession? The war was fought because one side sought to keep the Union together, while the other sought to divide it in two. Not because Lincoln was scheming for a civil war, but because the South knew that's what it would take to gain their own independence.
- Colonel Paul YinglingNobody who wins a war indulges in a bifurcated definition of victory. War is a political act; victory and defeat have meaning only in political terms. A country incapable of achieving its political objectives at an acceptable cost is losing the war, regardless of battlefield events.
Bifurcating victory (e.g. winning militarily, losing politically) is a useful salve for defeated armies. The "stab in the back" narrative helped take the sting out of failure for German generals after WWI and their American counterparts after Vietnam.
All the same, it's nonsense. To paraphrase Vince Lombardi, show me a political loser, and I'll show you a loser.

Last edited by Henrin; 05-22-12 at 11:43 PM.

1. Leaving the union was NOT illegal.
2. Lincoln was to respect that the fort was not his and the actions by the south were not illegal.
3. He was to therefore leave the fort when ordered to do so.
4. It is a fact that Lincoln needed to make the south look like the aggressor and there is no better way to do it than what he did.

Hey how about the ask a Texan thread? see ya'll there.
