• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

For Romney voters only!

Vote now:

  • Total voters
    33
Re: For Romney voters only

lpast said:
All the polls say your Obama 55 romney 45 number is wrong, even with the 5% disclaimer...most indicate romeny slightly ahead within the margin or error....its not a big point ...but your 10pt spread in favor of obama is in my mind way out of line..
Click to expand...

Polls...now...months out from the election. Essentially worthless. While Romney may be doing better in terms of the POLLS right now, I think the overall chances of who actually wins leans slightly in Obama's favor.

Polls don't determine elections. Especially polls months out from it.

Also, my 55% Obama 45% Romney wasn't my thought about results but my level of confidence or view on the chances of each. If you asked me who would win right now, I'd say I think Obama slightly more than I think Romney but ultimately it's pretty much a toss up.
 
Last edited:
Re: For Romney voters only

It seems as if this election is Obama's to lose, and he keeps doing things that decrease his chances of winning.

It is noted that people on this form that are not and never going to vote for Romney have voted in the OP poll, ignoring the thread title/request.
 
Re: For Romney voters only

I'm not thrill about Romney because I think he is weak on conservatism, and the issue of Obamacare. This will play against him during the election. A slightly positive side is that the election will be about Obama more than Romney.
 
Re: For Romney voters only

American said:
I'm not thrill about Romney because I think he is weak on conservatism, and the issue of Obamacare. This will play against him during the election. A slightly positive side is that the election will be about Obama more than Romney.
Click to expand...

I agree with you Romney is no Conservative but he is 1000 times better the Hussein Obama............So even though I will vote for Romney it is actually a vote against Hussein Obama....We must get that incompetent out of office.......
 
Re: For Romney voters only

Zyphlin said:
Polls...now...months out from the election. Essentially worthless. While Romney may be doing better in terms of the POLLS right now, I think the overall chances of who actually wins leans slightly in Obama's favor.

Polls don't determine elections. Especially polls months out from it.

Also, my 55% Obama 45% Romney wasn't my thought about results but my level of confidence or view on the chances of each. If you asked me who would win right now, I'd say I think Obama slightly more than I think Romney but ultimately it's pretty much a toss up.
Click to expand...

I would not go as far as to say they are worthless......They give us some kind of Idea of what people are thinking and something for us political junkies to kick around.
 
Re: For Romney voters only

Navy Pride said:
I agree with you Romney is no Conservative but he is 1000 times better the Hussein Obama............So even though I will vote for Romney it is actually a vote against Hussein Obama....We must get that incompetent out of office.......
Click to expand...

And you still are calling Obama your pretty boy. I find that fascinating.
 
Re: For Romney voters only

I think it's more likely than not that Romney will win. Virtually all conservatives except myself will vote for him because they desperately want President Obama out of office. I think most Independents will break Romney's way because they realize the country is on the road to no where. And even some liberals will vote for Romney because they realize he's Obama lite. I like Gary Johnson...but that's because I feel there is no longer anything to lose by voting as a matter of principle.
 
Considering the fact that Obama is a communist, and given the activities of his minions (ACORN and other useful idiots willing to break the law to win), I'm sure Obama subscribes to the philosophy of another communist dictator (Joseph Stalin).

'It's Not the People Who Vote that Count; It's the People Who Count the Votes'

In a fair election, I think Romney would win decisively, but this will NOT be a fair election. There was voter fraud in 2008, and they will be going for broke this time.
 
S.J. said:
Considering the fact that Obama is a communist, and given the activities of his minions (ACORN and other useful idiots willing to break the law to win),
Click to expand...

Would you like to back that up?

Daily Kos: ACORN exonerated: The tapes were edited. Will the media retract and apologize?

ACORN didn't break state laws, California attorney general says | McClatchy

The BRAD BLOG : NYT PUBLIC EDITOR FINALLY ADMITS ACORN 'PIMP' HOAX REPORTING FAILURE: 'TIMES WAS WRONG, I HAVE BEEN WRONG DEFENDING PAPER'

Then there's this...

Who


The GOP voter-fraud vendetta might have remained exactly where Bush loyalists wanted it—below the radar of the press—had it not been for the scandal surrounding the firing of eight U. S. attorneys, including David C. Iglesias of New Mexico. Iglesias lost his job in December 2005 after he declined to prosecute a voter-fraud case against ACORN, which had been registering large numbers of voters in the state’s low-income and largely minority neighborhoods in 2004. Prominent New Mexico Republicans, including U.S. Senator Pete Domenici, had repeatedly complained to chief White House political strategist Karl Rove about Iglesias’ failure to bring voter-fraud indictments. Once Iglesias said he couldn’t prove a case against ACORN, his days were numbered.

ACORN became a target because of its successful voter-registration work. As the 2004 election approached, then-Attorney-General John Ashcroft launched a broad initiative to crack down on supposed voter fraud in battleground states, including Florida, Missouri, Ohio, and New Mexico, where ACORN was making headway registering voters. In all of those states, Republicans filed suits against ACORN for voter fraud, and, in every case, ACORN was exonerated.​
 
Last edited:
S.J. said:
Considering the fact that Obama is a communist, and given the activities of his minions (ACORN and other useful idiots willing to break the law to win), I'm sure Obama subscribes to the philosophy of another communist dictator (Joseph Stalin).

'It's Not the People Who Vote that Count; It's the People Who Count the Votes'

In a fair election, I think Romney would win decisively, but this will NOT be a fair election. There was voter fraud in 2008, and they will be going for broke this time.
Click to expand...

The only way a Republican can actually win is to win by enough votes that the votes of the dead, felons and those pulled out of a wastebasket won't count......
 
I'm not a "Romney voter", so, even though I'm not an "Obama voter", I didn't answer the poll.

However, I long ago said Obama will slaughter Romney.

Obama has the "home court" advantage as the sitting president, so to beat him, Romney will have to out-presedential him.

Though Romney may look more presidential, there are simply too many gaffe-like remarks that have issued forth from his mouth.

In the end, the great majority at the center, not hugely swung by ideology at all, will favor the candidate who they would most trust with the little black box and to have international diplomatic prowess.

That will be Obama.

Sad, though, that we don't have any considerably better choices than these.
 
Ontologuy said:
I'm not a "Romney voter", so, even though I'm not an "Obama voter", I didn't answer the poll.

However, I long ago said Obama will slaughter Romney.

Obama has the "home court" advantage as the sitting president, so to beat him, Romney will have to out-presedential him.

Though Romney may look more presidential, there are simply too many gaffe-like remarks that have issued forth from his mouth.

In the end, the great majority at the center, not hugely swung by ideology at all, will favor the candidate who they would most trust with the little black box and to have international diplomatic prowess.

That will be Obama.

Sad, though, that we don't have any considerably better choices than these.
Click to expand...

I can remember several other presidents who had a HC advantage as you call it and they got their butts kicked.......
 
leftofabbie said:
Would you like to back that up?

Daily Kos: ACORN exonerated: The tapes were edited. Will the media retract and apologize?

ACORN didn't break state laws, California attorney general says | McClatchy

The BRAD BLOG : NYT PUBLIC EDITOR FINALLY ADMITS ACORN 'PIMP' HOAX REPORTING FAILURE: 'TIMES WAS WRONG, I HAVE BEEN WRONG DEFENDING PAPER'

Then there's this...

Who


The GOP voter-fraud vendetta might have remained exactly where Bush loyalists wanted it—below the radar of the press—had it not been for the scandal surrounding the firing of eight U. S. attorneys, including David C. Iglesias of New Mexico. Iglesias lost his job in December 2005 after he declined to prosecute a voter-fraud case against ACORN, which had been registering large numbers of voters in the state’s low-income and largely minority neighborhoods in 2004. Prominent New Mexico Republicans, including U.S. Senator Pete Domenici, had repeatedly complained to chief White House political strategist Karl Rove about Iglesias’ failure to bring voter-fraud indictments. Once Iglesias said he couldn’t prove a case against ACORN, his days were numbered.

ACORN became a target because of its successful voter-registration work. As the 2004 election approached, then-Attorney-General John Ashcroft launched a broad initiative to crack down on supposed voter fraud in battleground states, including Florida, Missouri, Ohio, and New Mexico, where ACORN was making headway registering voters. In all of those states, Republicans filed suits against ACORN for voter fraud, and, in every case, ACORN was exonerated.​
Click to expand...
Aren't you sort of changing the subject here? I mentioned voter fraud, you posted links about pimps.
 
Re: For Romney voters only

Navy Pride said:
I would not go as far as to say they are worthless......They give us some kind of Idea of what people are thinking and something for us political junkies to kick around.
Click to expand...

That's why I say essentially. They're good political fodder for discussion, but when it comes to telling us whats going to happen in the election at this point they're a bit useless
 
Re: For Romney voters only

Arbo said:
It seems as if this election is Obama's to lose, and he keeps doing things that decrease his chances of winning.

It is noted that people on this form that are not and never going to vote for Romney have voted in the OP poll, ignoring the thread title/request.
Click to expand...

Thank you, unfortunately there is no way to stop them.........I just eliminate their vote.....
 
Re: For Romney voters only

Albert Di Salvo said:
I think it's more likely than not that Romney will win. Virtually all conservatives except myself will vote for him because they desperately want President Obama out of office. I think most Independents will break Romney's way because they realize the country is on the road to no where. And even some liberals will vote for Romney because they realize he's Obama lite. I like Gary Johnson...but that's because I feel there is no longer anything to lose by voting as a matter of principle.
Click to expand...

You make a lot of sense, the problem with your scenario is if you vote for Johnson then that is a vote for Hussein Obama......
 
Re: For Romney voters only

Navy Pride said:
I am not crazy about Romney myself but because of his moderate stance on the issues I believe he can win in November.....The American people will never elect a far lefty (Obama) or a far righty (Santorum)......Hussein Obama fooled us in 2008, that will not happen again............
Click to expand...

We've been fooled before, many times, and no doubt will be fooled again in the future.

My very first presidential election, I voted for Johnson thinking that Goldwater would get us into a war. How's that for being fooled the first time?

I voted for Reagan in '80, thinking he'd actually limit the size and power of the growing federal bureaucracy. Fooled again.

Right now, predicting the outcome of the November election is about as easy as predicting the weather on election day. It's a tossup which one will be the next POTUS. Whichever one it is, don't expect miracles.
 
Re: For Romney voters only

My first vote for prez was JFK........I often wonder what might have happened as far as Vitenam goes if he was not killed..........I to voted for LBJ in 64...The biggest mistake of my voting life..........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom