I still say that war is a better choice than both. And I forgot to mention that I hate war.
That's a ridiculous question. Either would be a disaster.
Silly poll but I picked totalitarianism because well I'm just assuming that i'd be the dictator. Otherwise I'd pick neither
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.
none of the above
why is it that balance between the two cannot be an option ?
I love the NSA. It's like having a secret fan-base you will never see, but they're there, watching everything you write and it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside knowing that I may be some person's only form of unconstitutional entertainment one night.
I put a premium on law and order, power structures, and more probability for scientific and technological advancement. I voted totalitarianism.
"We all of us know down here that politics is a tough game. And I don't think there's any point in being Irish if you don't know that the world is going to break your heart eventually."-Daniel Patrick Moynihan, December 5, 1963
Neither. Anarchy is inherently unsustainable anyhow, it will stop being anarchy almost immediately as people group together with those of similar views and form societies.