"you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos
Wow -- someone finally voted for option 1 (49-1)!
Talk about a champion of the underdog!
I had neglected to vote, and even though option 2 is where I'm at, I was beginning to consider voting for option 1 just because I was feeling sorry for it.
I mean, nothing should ever be mauled this badly.
So .. who was it that voted for option 1? -- I want to shake your hand, you great humanitarian!
When the election is over and we open our eyes, it will sadly be too late to wonder what the hell just happened.
Notice how Darwin coupled Negroes and Australian Aborigines with gorillas and contrasted them with Caucasians (despite the fact that Negroes, Aborigines and Caucasians are all 100% human, while gorillas are 100% ape). Essentially, this is what modern Darwinists do with groups like the Neanderthals. Neanderthals appear to have been just another race of humans with superficial “ape-like” characteristics like the Australian Aborigines. They appear to have suffered from pathological conditions like rickets and arthritis which exacerbated their superficial ape-like characteristics (rickets is a vitamin D deficiency which softens the bones and can cause people to hunch over). Not only can humans be born with “ape-like” traits like heavy brow ridges and large, jutting jaws, but pathologies like cephalic disorders, syphilis, scurvy and rickets can make them look even more ape-like later in life. But everything we know about Neanderthals suggests that they were just as human as modern-day Australian Aborigines. They were skilled hunters, lived in complex societies, buried their dead, and practiced religion.
The Missing Link - has it been found?
Probably should start a separate thread though, this subject could derail this one, I'd participate.
This is from that site, I never heard this before, YIKES!
Some 19th- and 20th-century Darwinists thought that all non-Caucasian people were ape-like and therefore inferior to whites. Darwin himself wrote that “at some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world.
Last edited by sawyerloggingon; 04-28-12 at 10:46 AM.
What I find when I continue along this discussion with many creationists (not saying you are one), is it eventually becomes evident that there is no potential discovery that they would accept as definitive. So what characteristics would you expect to see in a specimen that meets your definition of a "missing link"?
AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.
From a very informative site. The Evolution of Early Man
The "Missing Link"....can be a thousand different things, depending on how far back we decide to go:
"May 19, 2009—Meet "Ida," the small "missing link" found in Germany that's created a big media splash and will likely continue to make waves among those who study human origins. "
It is rather obvious that evolution is a better explanation than Some old white guy waving an enchanted potato as he scooped up a chunk of clay he made out of nothing the day before.
Here's how the missing link argument goes:
One of you will end up here next!