• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is the biggest problem facing humanity?

Which of these would do the most good for the world?

  • Providing everyone in the world with access to information and communication (e.g. the internet)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Developing an effective, efficient transportation infrastructure in all parts of the world

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    62
We need to start with Big Energy. Wars are profitable for Big Energy because they run on energy (oil, gas, deisel). They make huge profits and heavy cash positions make them bankers, as well. They control politicians to start wars where additional resources can be plugged it to their distribution network, all the while profiting from the war. Their huge profits give them huge influence in banking. This is a well-established, well-oiled financial hierarchy that has controlled the USA for about a hundred years. If a cheap energy resource is developed, these same profiteers will do all in their power to prevent its implementation. Why do you think all the Renewable Energy money goes into foolish big money endeavors, giant windmills, giant acreage of solar PV, instead of local homes? The energy distribution network has gamed the system. This ain't rocket science.
 
Except that the sub-replacement birthrate has combined with large social safety net programs to create a situation in which the largest members of the First World are insolvent. The EU, Japan, and possibly the US aren't going to ever-so-slowly-slide into a situation of the-West-and-the-rest; they are going to go through a period of bankruptcies which will cause massive economic destruction and upheaval. The integration of the global economy (and the part those nations play in the global supply chain) ensures that they will be wrecked as well.

The US and Japan aren't going to ever go bankrupt as long as they continue to issue their sovereign debt in their own currency. Worst case case scenario for the US and Japan is that entitlements aren't reformed at all, and the value of the currency gradually slides over time. The eurozone is in a more precarious situation since the nations within it control their own fiscal policy but not their monetary policy...but even in this case, it's likely that the issue will be resolved one way or another in the aftermath of financial crises (either this one or the next one). Eventually the eurozone will have to either abandon the euro, or form a United States of Europe. Assuming Europe eventually solves this problem one way or another, its long term prospects need not be so dire. No nation can ever be forced into insolvency if its debt is issued in its own currency.

I'm not too worried about declining birth rates in the long term for this reason. Additionally, countries facing a demographic collapse could open the immigration valve a bit to ease that problem. That seems more likely in the US than in Europe or Japan, but it's something they should all be considering.
 
Last edited:
"Entitlement reform ..... increase the retirement age for many to 70, not coal miners of course, nor others in hazardous occupations.
Income tax rate reform....raise the rate that the millionaires pay to ...say...50%..Try to keep the rates as fair as possible..
I have little against "millionaires", but billionaires ? that is going too far...
IMO, our economy would be in better shape if people did NOT overcharge for their goods and services..


Im not against entitlement reform...Im against entitlement reform that totally destroys a program to give it to the rich <RYANS PLAN>
Im against raising taxs and I dont think its necessary, end the tax havens and raise capitol gains.....raise tarrifs on chinese made american garbage so its not worthwhile for them to employ communist chinese over their own.
The argument that tax cuts create jobs and encourage growth is a LIE and its never worked...corporations and the rich have recieved tax cut after tax cut to the tune of a full 50% Capitol Gains was reduced and they didnt create a job they still sent them all to china and elsewhere and we lost jobs...its time americans became aware of the far right conjob
 
What, in your opinion, is the biggest problem facing humanity? Suppose that you had one wish, which you had to use altruistically to make the world a better place. Which do you think would do the most "good" (however you want to define that), and why?

- Providing everyone in the world with access to clean water
- Providing everyone in the world with enough nutritious food
- Providing everyone in the world with free, high-quality K-12 education
- Providing everyone in the world with access to Western-quality health care
- Providing everyone in the world with access to information and communication (e.g. the internet)
- Bringing peace, stability, and safety to every part of the world
- Bringing democracy and freedom to every part of the world
- Developing a 100% clean, very cheap source of energy that could be produced and distributed anywhere in the world
- Developing an effective, efficient transportation infrastructure in all parts of the world
- Other

So building a perfect utopian society is the biggest problem facing humanity? I guess we're doomed to failure then. The standard is ridiculous.
 
"What is the biggest problem facing humanity?"

BIG GOVERNMENT

Other (please describe) - Drastically scale back and limit government power to it's absolute bare minimum and demand accountability.
Agreed. This must be the very crux of most of which we term 'problems' in 'society'.
 
So building a perfect utopian society is the biggest problem facing humanity? I guess we're doomed to failure then. The standard is ridiculous.

I don't know what "standard" you're referring to, or how in the world you read the poll and interpreted it as a "perfect utopian society" to simply ask which of those things would do the most good for the world. It's an exercise to determine what people think are the most pressing issues facing the world; if you do not have the mental faculties to engage in such a thought experiment, you do not have to participate.
:2wave:
 
Last edited:
We would not have this so-called "big government" if man would only behave himself..
Is he ?
LOL, whata crocka bull malarky!!!__Big government is nothing more than a Marxist lie that promises to redistribute the rewards of the producers to the nonproducers by playing on the desire of losers to get something for nothing.

The only ones who believe this nonsense are the gullible suckers who haven't learned the historical lesson that once the producers have been destroyed, the nonproducers are left at the mercy of a Big Government totalitarian police state.

Duhhh__Haven't you ever wondered why they work so hard at disarming the masses before the fateful day when the true nature of the beast rears it's ugly head???__The Marxist/Progressive architects are well aware that rebellion is inevitable.
 
LOL, whata crocka bull malarky!!!__Big government is nothing more than a Marxist lie that promises to redistribute the rewards of the producers to the nonproducers by playing on the desire of losers to get something for nothing.

The only ones who believe this nonsense are the gullible suckers who haven't learned the historical lesson that once the producers have been destroyed, the nonproducers are left at the mercy of a Big Government totalitarian police state.

Duhhh__Haven't you ever wondered why they work so hard at disarming the masses before the fateful day when the true nature of the beast rears it's ugly head???__The Marxist/Progressive architects are well aware that rebellion is inevitable.
If you want to be totally honest with the world as your heroine, Ayn Rand, espouses you should change your Lean.
 
If you want to be totally honest with the world as your heroine, Ayn Rand, espouses you should change your Lean.
From what to what???__Please be specific with your opinion!
 
From what to what???__Please be specific with your opinion!

If you want to be totally honest with the world as your heroine, Ayn Rand, espouses you should change your Lean.

Ayn Rand didn't like Libertarians. Besides, most Libertarians are too ashamed of their lean to just come out of the proverbial closet.
 
Ayn Rand didn't like Libertarians.
Nor am I 100% libertarian_____But regardless;

Exactly what was it about libertarians that Ayn Rand didn't like?

I'm very interested in whatever facts you can provide on this subject?

Besides, most Libertarians are too ashamed of their lean to just come out of the proverbial closet.
Most libertarians that I've known take great pride in their political uniqueness__Go figure?!
 
Nor am I 100% libertarian_____But regardless;

I agree, most Libertarians aren't as weird as you seem to be if what you say about your life and upbringing is true. However, I seriously doubt any of it is true and you just don't want to admit your parents are die hard liberals ashamed that they raised a Rand-ophile.

Exactly what was it about libertarians that Ayn Rand didn't like?

I'm very interested in whatever facts you can provide on this subject?

The Ayn Rand Institute: Ayn Rand's Q & A on Libertarianism

Q: Do you think Libertarians communicate the ideas of freedom and capitalism effectively? [Q&A following LP’s “Objective Communication,” Lecture 1, 1980]

AR: I don’t think plagiarists are effective. I’ve read nothing by a Libertarian (when I read them, in the early years) that wasn’t my ideas badly mishandled—i.e., had the teeth pulled out of them—with no credit given. I didn’t know whether I should be glad that no credit was given, or disgusted. I felt both. They are perhaps the worst political group today, because they can do the most harm to capitalism, by making it disreputable.

Most libertarians that I've known take great pride in their political uniqueness__Go figure?!

Yeah, I've been to freak shows in India. They take great pride in their "uniqueness" too.
 
Last edited:
lulz .........................
Big Government decides what constitutes bad behavior and ensures that we "behave" ourselves.

Well isn't that special__I feel safer already. :july_4th: :liar2
 
Overpopulation... by FAR the biggest problem.
 
I agree, most Libertarians aren't as weird as you seem to be if what you say about your life and upbringing is true. However, I seriously doubt any of it is true and you just don't want to admit your parents are die hard liberals ashamed that they raised a Rand-ophile.
My personal life is no big deal to me and what you believe or disbelieve is absolutely of no importance.

To be honest, it never occurred to me that so many people would be so angry and offended by my short bio.

Any personal information I may have provided was simply to help people better understand me and my opinions.

The Ayn Rand Institute: Ayn Rand's Q & A on Libertarianism

Q: Do you think Libertarians communicate the ideas of freedom and capitalism effectively? [Q&A following LP’s “Objective Communication,” Lecture 1, 1980]

AR: I don’t think plagiarists are effective. I’ve read nothing by a Libertarian (when I read them, in the early years) that wasn’t my ideas badly mishandled—i.e., had the teeth pulled out of them—with no credit given. I didn’t know whether I should be glad that no credit was given, or disgusted. I felt both. They are perhaps the worst political group today, because they can do the most harm to capitalism, by making it disreputable.
This is nothing new__Ayn Rand was born and came of age in Russia during the revolution and knew of the evils of communism first hand and came to hate it__She managed to escape to the US at age 21 and never returned.

Her only problem with Libertarianism was that she believed it allowed to much freedom of access to political power by socialism, which she knew was just a stepping stone between capitalism and communism__For which I agree.

Mike Wallace and Ayn Rand showing their true colors.
[video]http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Ayn+Rand+russia&mid=C4171B0269E8EAA0DC4DC4171B0269E8EAA0DC4D&view=detail&FORM=VIRE1[/video]

Yeah, I've been to freak shows in India. They take great pride in their "uniqueness" too.
NWR___(not worthy of reply)
 
My personal life is no big deal to me and what you believe or disbelieve is absolutely of no importance.
To be honest, it never occurred to me that so many people would be so angry and offended by my short bio.
Any personal information I may have provided was simply to help people better understand me and my opinions.

That's fine and dandy, I just find it weird and irregular, even for a Libertarian.

This is nothing new__Ayn Rand was born and came of age in Russia during the revolution and knew of the evils of communism first hand and came to hate it__She managed to escape to the US at age 21 and never returned.

Her only problem with Libertarianism was that she believed it allowed to much freedom of access to political power by socialism, which she knew was just a stepping stone between capitalism and communism__For which I agree.

Mike Wallace and Ayn Rand showing their true colors.
[video]http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Ayn+Rand+russia&mid=C4171B0269E8EAA0DC4DC4171B0269E8EAA0DC4D&view=detail&FORM=VIRE1[/video]

Yeah, her problem seems to be a little bit more than that. Considering she called Libertarians HARMFUL to Capitalism which they seem to endorse.

NWR___(not worthy of reply)

Okie?
 
What, in your opinion, is the biggest problem facing humanity? Suppose that you had one wish, which you had to use altruistically to make the world a better place. Which do you think would do the most "good" (however you want to define that), and why?

- Providing everyone in the world with access to clean water
- Providing everyone in the world with enough nutritious food
- Providing everyone in the world with free, high-quality K-12 education
- Providing everyone in the world with access to Western-quality health care
- Providing everyone in the world with access to information and communication (e.g. the internet)
- Bringing peace, stability, and safety to every part of the world
- Bringing democracy and freedom to every part of the world
- Developing a 100% clean, very cheap source of energy that could be produced and distributed anywhere in the world
- Developing an effective, efficient transportation infrastructure in all parts of the world
- Other

I would say overpopulation. We're beyond long-term sustainability, and we keep on breeding.
 
Yeah, her problem seems to be a little bit more than that. Considering she called Libertarians HARMFUL to Capitalism
Yeah, that's what I said.

which they seem to endorse.
They do.

(you don't appear to have grasped my post)
 
Yeah, that's what I said.

They do.

(you don't appear to have grasped my post)

You seem to be lost, minimizing Ayn Rand's dislike of Libertarians because the "only" problem she had with them was that she opposed their entire raison d'etre, is a little disingenuous.
 
Our biggest, most delicious problem is giant Cannibal Shrimp.

shrimp.jpg
Cannibal shrimp: The invasion has begun | The Upshot - Yahoo! News
 
Ayn Rand didn't like Libertarians. Besides, most Libertarians are too ashamed of their lean to just come out of the proverbial closet.
The Ayn Rand Institute: Ayn Rand's Q & A on Libertarianism

Q: Do you think Libertarians communicate the ideas of freedom and capitalism effectively? [Q&A following LP’s “Objective Communication,” Lecture 1, 1980]

AR: I don’t think plagiarists are effective. I’ve read nothing by a Libertarian (when I read them, in the early years) that wasn’t my ideas badly mishandled—i.e., had the teeth pulled out of them—with no credit given. I didn’t know whether I should be glad that no credit was given, or disgusted. I felt both. They are perhaps the worst political group today, because they can do the most harm to capitalism, by making it disreputable.
Wow! I actually did know she wasn't happy with them but I did not know she despised them! Thanks for the link. :)

Regardless of her feelings for them, it doesn't stop the Libertarians from admiring her works and, as she herself put it, plagiarizing her ideas.
 
Overpopulation... by FAR the biggest problem.

It's not really that it's overpopulated, but that we have pulled all the natural stops to overpopulation- some through technology, and others through dominance by emotions. It's not that these emotional motives are bad, it's just that they tend to ignore the reality of limited resources.
 
The US and Japan aren't going to ever go bankrupt as long as they continue to issue their sovereign debt in their own currency. Worst case case scenario for the US and Japan is that entitlements aren't reformed at all, and the value of the currency gradually slides over time.

There will be nothing "gradual" about it. Capital is extremely fungible. Three Fourths of US dollars are held overseas. When it becomes obvious that the US intends to monetize it's debt (aside from all the other problems that will cause), most of those will come crashing home, and they will do so very quickly. The dollar is the note of the Federal Reserve, and there will be a world-wide run on the bank. US Borrowing Rates will soar, and the United States will be caught in an interest rate spiral, meaning that we will have to inflate the monetary supply by 10% of GDP every year just to be able to spend all the money we have promised, and that is before the world dumps the dollar as the reserve and oil currency. We will shift into hyperinflation, and for a short time annualized rates could rise to the triple digits. With no domestic demand for Treasury Bonds that now pay far below inflation, the abilities of the Fed to combat that will be roughly nil. Japan will probably not last as we know her for another 5 years - even at the ridiculously low interest rates provided by her massive domestic savings rate (which we lack), too many are retiring and being replaced by too few workers. That means that there won't be any net domestic savings to keep that rate low. The money will flee from Europe to Japan and the US, and then when it realizes that Japan is a doomed ship, it will flee to the US, and then investors (who no longer trust sovereign debt) will look with a jaundiced eye to see if our downgraded bonds are trustworthy... just as it is becoming obvious that we intend to monetize the debt.

The CBO says that the US Economy will functionally cease to exist in the 2030's under our current path. Frankly, I suspect that is wildly optimistic, as it assumes international stability, strong growth, permanent low treasury rates, and current law reductions in spending. If President Romney serves two terms and fails to structurally change our entitlements, the President that follows him will preside over destruction of the level not wrecked on this nation since the 1860's. I'll be alright - I know how to kill people (with all due respect to Ms Streisand: people who kill people are the most employable people in the world). Many of our fellow Americans whose livelihoods are dependent upon a highly integrated (and frankly fragile) global supply chain and extreme division of labor may find themselves in for a rude surprise.

The eurozone is in a more precarious situation since the nations within it control their own fiscal policy but not their monetary policy...but even in this case, it's likely that the issue will be resolved one way or another in the aftermath of financial crises (either this one or the next one). Eventually the eurozone will have to either abandon the euro, or form a United States of Europe. Assuming Europe eventually solves this problem one way or another, its long term prospects need not be so dire. No nation can ever be forced into insolvency if its debt is issued in its own currency.

Forming a United States of Europe would lead to nigh open revolt at home, and impossible economics abroad for the European nations. The last Constitution required enough obvious ignoring-the-peasantry, and sparked enough of a backlash. Attempts to create an USE will not so much pour gasoline as nitroglycerin on the current fires of nationalism/fascism that are starting to smolder on that continent. As far as fiscal integration and carrying everyone else's burden, Germans have been pushed about as far as they are probably willing to go. Splitting up the EU and letting the southern states restructure their debt (read: declare bankruptcy) will happen, and when it does massive amounts of "wealth" will disappear and Europe will be in the mother of all liquidity crises at the same time that she is trying to perform massive structural changes to her currency. Good luck with that. Everyone thinks that the losers will be Greece, maybe Spain and Portugal. In reality, it's going to be Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, probably Ireland, and quite possibly France.

I'm not too worried about declining birth rates in the long term for this reason. Additionally, countries facing a demographic collapse could open the immigration valve a bit to ease that problem

Which problem would that be? the problem isn't just that we are shrinking in our populace, it is that our welfare states are built upon a pyramid scheme model, and require steady influx of ever increasing numbers of people paying into the system. But floods of immigrants into a nation with a welfare state don't pay into the system as much as the natives - they disproportionately cost the system. Letting in floods of third-world immigrants without welfare state reform to keep them from becoming net fiscal burdens will exacerbate rather than solve the problem.

That seems more likely in the US than in Europe or Japan, but it's something they should all be considering.

Europe has been trying it for decades. It hasn't worked out quite as hoped - as I describe above, the immigrants come in and go on the dole in larger percentages than the natives, thereby exacerbating rather than helping the problem of too-many-people-taking-and-too-few-paying-in.
 
Back
Top Bottom