i understand the case fine.
and 'i dont need you to go to the store'
is not the same as 'no sir, its not necessary to follow the suspicious person you called us about'.
one is a benign act with very little opportunity for trouble,
the other is ignoring police advise and rushing into a situation you fully expect could be dangerous.
' ... i disagree with you ... but im pretty sure youre not hitler ... '
- jon stewart -
If you wish to speak of certain elements of the paparazzi, which are non-standard, then you should use a term qualifying what you mean........
Otherwise, you either spread misinformation to those who believe what you say, or look like a fool to those who find your suggestion ridiculous.
George had the knowledge an officer was on the way. George had the knowledge that he himself was armed. George had the knowledge he had his safe place in an SUV and the kid in the hoodie was running away on foot. George stated the person was running away and complained "they always get away".
George should have had knowledge of Florida law on concealed weapons and that I do not know.
My argument was there was clearly evidence to arrest him and it should go to trial and both humans should have all the evidence presented.
We have facts ... and that it does not look good for George ...yet possibly forensic evidence will demonstrate that Trayvon had a gun and jumped in Georges car or some crazy twist like that.
IMHO and purely subjective I do not really believe it was race ... just a wannabe cop with judgement issues and lack of knowledge of the law. Maybe other evidence will prove I am wrong on this opinion. I am glad it is gong to trial!
Now back to the person being chased and followed (be it me, Trayvon or my son) ... they would only know a husky guy in the dark was at first following by car and then then chose to leave their SUV in the dark in an isolated region and chose to take chase and if they cross that boundaries and get close enough ... the only thing I would condemn them to is to my self defense of them crossing a boundary.
All elements of the paparazzi will employ stealth tactics to follow their quarry. Your image of what they do has no bearing on the reality of what they do.If you wish to speak of certain elements of the paparazzi, which are non-standard, then you should use a term qualifying what you mean........
The people who find my suggestion ridiculous are guilty of ignorance, so why would I be bothered by their assessment of me?Otherwise, you either spread misinformation to those who believe what you say, or look like a fool to those who find your suggestion ridiculous.
The problem is that the ignorant are already filled with misinformation so they assume that true information is misinformation. It's sad when they cling to their misinformation to a degree that they reject true information, but, again, that is not my fault.
Tucker Case - Tard magnet.