- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
- Messages
- 25,662
- Reaction score
- 21,196
- Location
- Fort Drum, New York
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Personally I think the better question would be Bush v Gore.
Personally I think the better question would be Bush v Gore.
as I said before SB im unsure Gore could of handled 9/11 in the manner it needed to be handled.
Maybe but given what a Pimp Gore has become (people whine about Romney being a flip flopper, they ought to see Gore's ratings on various issues as a senator vs as a member of the clinton administration and then as a candidate) in terms of making millions of off being an enviro-snake oil salesman (that his mansion emits more "carbon" then most small businesses or subdivisions is a clue) Bush was obviously the right choice
as I said before SB im unsure Gore could of handled 9/11 in the manner it needed to be handled.
Alright Higgs, how exactly do you think Bush handled 9/11 well, and in what sense do you think anyone else in the same position would not have handled it likewise?
Personally, I think 9/11 resulted in perhaps one of the most disastrous decades foreign-policy-wise in the history of our country.
in terms on the initial response I think Bush did well, he was calm, he kept the USA united, reached out to other countries and struck Afghan ( and didnt rush into it as some wanted him to).
Of course Iraq has its critics but I dont see that connected to 9/11.
Can I have some of what you're smoking?Gore and Kerry continue to prove that Bush was the better choice.
Personally, I think most individuals placed into a similar situation would do exactly the same.
It wasn't, but at the time one of the arguments for going to war was that Iraq was linked to AQ. I think the possibility exists that if 9/11 had not happened, Iraqi Freedom would perhaps not have happened.
Bush started a war in another country and forgot about OBL all together.well he would have sent the EPA after OBL due to all the pollutants emitted when the WTC collapsed and burned
Can I have some of what you're smoking?
Bush started a war in another country and forgot about OBL all together.
that is the propaganda the leftwing spews. How many people do you know were high placed members of the administration that can confirm or deny that claim of yours?
that is the propaganda the leftwing spews. How many people do you know were high placed members of the administration that can confirm or deny that claim of yours?
that is the propaganda the leftwing spews. How many people do you know were high placed members of the administration that can confirm or deny that claim of yours?
If we're going to be more accurate I think Katie meant to say that Iraq was a costly and unnecessary distraction from the war in Afghanistan. I don't really think that part is debatable.
If we're going to be more accurate I think Katie meant to say that Iraq was a costly and unnecessary distraction from the war in Afghanistan. I don't really think that part is debatable.
Tell me where were they hunting for OBL that would be Afghanistan. Why in the middle of a mission or conflict or whatever you'd like to call it do you change direction and bomb a Iraq where al-Qaeda had no serious presence before the attacks and war. Come on now get real. You don't stop chasing the bad guy to do something completely different.
I agree
we should have squashed SH to make an example out of him (notice how Libya came around after that) and left
but I think that war was a mistake
the Military never stopped searching for OBL
I agree
we should have squashed SH to make an example out of him (notice how Libya came around after that) and left
but I think that war was a mistake
the Military never stopped searching for OBL
And the military did a great job finding him under Obama's watch. Bush dropped the ball.
To bad she didn't shave.