• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who will you vote for in the 2012 presidential election...

Who will you vote for in the 2012 Presidential Election?


  • Total voters
    113
How do you figure, that an Imperial President, Pentagon yes-man ,and Right Wing warmonger like Obama /Hillary escalating wars and insisting on regime changes around the globe are Leftys ???

Where's the "**** this I'm not voting option" ?

Roseanne Barr was just nominated to lead the Green Party!
 
How do you figure, that an Imperial President, Pentagon yes-man ,and Right Wing warmonger like Obama /Hillary escalating wars and insisting on regime changes around the globe are Leftys ???

Where's the "**** this I'm not voting option" ?

:failpail:

Snob.

Philadelphia Green Party Endorses Roseanne Barr For President | PhillyNow | A blog about Philadelphia news, politics and culture by Philadelphia Weekly
 
Now that's a party that has jumped the shark.
 
sure he ran on the Republican ticket, but his politics obviously aren't neo con. He ran on that ticket because he knows that people vote for either of those two parties.
he's been a Republican for a very long time.... and he is not going to get the nomination this year.

if you like Dr. Paul's politics, check out Gary Johnson of the Libertarian party... he'll be on the ballot this election, and Ron Paul won't.
 
Sure, that's where a voter doesn't select anyone for president.

Still would have been interesting if this poll did have 4 choices.

1. Barack Obama
2. Mitt Romney
3. Voted for Obama in 2008, voting 3rd party or staying home in 2012
4. Voted for McCain in 2008, voting 3rd party or staying home in 2012
 
Still would have been interesting if this poll did have 4 choices.

1. Barack Obama
2. Mitt Romney
3. Voted for Obama in 2008, voting 3rd party or staying home in 2012
4. Voted for McCain in 2008, voting 3rd party or staying home in 2012

5. Voted for Obama in 2008, voting for Mitt Romney.
6. Voted for McCain in 2008, voting for Obama.

Because then I'd have to be number 5.
 
I might vote third party, but I won't be voting for Roseanne.

Of course you won't. That's the point of picking her. They don't want a repeat of 2000 when Nader gave us 8 years of recurring nightmares, AKA GW Bush.
At least you wouldn't be voting to raise your taxes like with Romney. It's called "broadening the base" in Romneyspeak but it means getting more revenue from those that can least afford it. The money has to come from somewhere and HIS taxes are going down if he gets his way.

P.S. When Nader was asked if he regretted throwing the election to Bush he said "we deserve him". What an A**, huh? Nobody deserves that kind of punishment.
 
Last edited:
Romney, happily.

Also I'm not sure how anyone who voted for Bush could deem Romney as not (fiscally) conservative enough for their vote.
 
I'm thinking I just might write in Machiavelli
 
lol where is the 3rd party option? I'm not voting for either. I wrote in "captain jack sparrow" for the last governor election, cause he was more capable than anyone else on the ballot. Might do something similar.
 
They are manging multiple wars beind the scenes already. Yemen, Syria, Bahrain, Af-Pak, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, as they use Newspeak dogma regarding "humanitarian" concerns, this is merely a cover for installing or maintaining puppet regimes the U.S. and it allies can control. All this talk of democracy from rebels is merely a stage play for U.S. proxy soldiers.


So are all you leftys gonna vote for Obama, even though we all know that he is deliberately delaying wars with Syria and Iran until after the election?

You know those wars will commence as soon as he's re-elected, yes?

Did they commence with your ultimate bad-boy Bush after his reelection?

No, Bush did the surge in Iraq, the "Salvador Option," it was called - that disasterous Falluja massacre.




No, they commenced after his first election. I consider both Obama and Bush to be war-mongers and a threat to our freedom. Kane has a valid point. Do you disagree that he will become more militarily aggressive after his reelection?

Well, I guess I'm all for both idiotic parties bickering so hard that they're too incompetent to start another war for us. Sometimes your government's own incompetence can be an asset.

Yeah. I do. I to a large extent embrace this vision:

The State of the World: Explaining U.S. Strategy | Stratfor

So you as a liberal, support NATO arming and starting another Iraq type disaster in Syria?
 
I don't want to go to Syria and occupy it, no. You might be able to convince me in some number of years to do a Libya, but that's unlikely at the moment. I do like NATO though.
 
Last edited:
I don't want to go to Syria and occupy it, no. You might be able to convince me in some number of years to do a Libya, but that's unlikely at the moment. I do like NATO though.

I'm not trying to be mean, but I think if you believe yourself to be liberal or you're a Democrat, and you are pro-war, you should leave the Party and join the Republicons!
 
Back
Top Bottom