I was discovering that life just simply isn't fair and bask in the unsung glory of knowing that each obstacle overcome along the way only adds to the satisfaction in the end. Nothing great, after all, was ever accomplished by anyone sulking in his or her misery.
You are using the term murderer only in an absolute sense. I feel certain terms, depending on context, could be used in a non-literal way to accurately describe the acts of another. Calling a dictator a murderer or a monster are two examples, given the fact they don't literally apply.
its not accurate because the definition of the word doesnt allow it to be
if there is no legal backing at best it would be your unsupported opinion he is a murder or you could possible defend it as "slang" but you would have no factual back at all.
You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
I read some articles about world top dictators and I feel that they do murdered their citizens, in one article it was written that one of the dictators use to punish people by put them in boiling water, isn't that less than a murder.
Do guests vote on these polls? Is that why it's showing 11 votes for No but only two members who made the vote?
I don't believe in defining murder strictly by law. Some nation may allow for honor killings and legally not call it murder, but it is still murder morally in my book.
Yes, dictators do murder their own citizens, and it doesn't matter what some international criminal court says.
Tired of elections being between the lesser of two evils.When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. -Socrates