Last edited by Henrin; 03-12-13 at 08:28 PM.
You gave me your fantasyland where you get to make it up as you go along. Lots of people look at things the way they want to. Those who do so crossing the border between reality and fantasy tend to have real problems.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers
My view is supported by reality itself, so I have little idea what you are talking about. Do you think law is all there is to consider?You gave me your fantasyland where you get to make it up as you go along. Lots of people look at things the way they want to. Those who do so crossing the border between reality and fantasy tend to have real problems.
Last edited by Henrin; 03-12-13 at 09:01 PM.
I talk of many issues dealing with such things. This issue here I just enjoy talking about and find it interesting how no one can seem to muster up a good argument to support the law.There are many constitutional rights that have been lost and or are in real danger. That you focus on being able to open a white only drug store seems odd.
Henrin. I see that your lean says libertarian. Is your stance based upon the non-aggression principle?
If I understand what the libertarians are saying, it is that it is always wrong to initiate violence against another person. Thus, it is wrong to initiate violence against a person in order to force him to grant access to his property.
So, while the property owner who excludes people for no other reason than that they are white, black, straight, gay, etc. may be acting in an abhorrent manner, he is not actually initiating violence against anyone, and therefore it would be wrong to initiate violence against him to make him comply with your wishes?
I'm just trying to understand the libertarian reasoning on this issue.