cmakaioz
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2012
- Messages
- 1,582
- Reaction score
- 451
- Location
- Oakland, CA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
You don't seem to know what the Heartbeat bill says. For instance, in the Oklahoma bill, it requires a woman who wants an abortion to hear the heartbeat of the fetus prior to the abortion being performed. So back to the point, the point of this additive bill for men, is a petty excuse to get back at men who have signed onto and are wanting to pass a law where women must hear the heartbeat prior to the abortion.
You're continued statement about a doctor approving, or doctors care is irrelevant... Neither I nor anyone else has stated a doctor is NOT involved.
Oh the bill is petty, alright, but THAT'S THE POINT.
See, there are already multiple petty bills in process AGAINST WOMEN...and some of them actually have a chance at passage.
The point so many are studiously missing is that YES, it is absurd and invasive to arbitrarily saddle people with completely irrelevant (and expensive, I'd add) requirements which inject the state into their personal medical decisions...all to score points with voters and funders whose politics come from the bronze age.
Let patients and their chosen medical professionals figure out important medical decisions, and keep the state out of folks' genitals already.
Last edited: