I'm a man: I'm fine with this waste of time/money
I'm a man: I find this offensive and a "tit for tat" useless bill
I'm a man: I support this bill
I'm a woman: I'm fine with this waste of time/money
I'm a woman: I find this offensive and a "tit for tat" useless bill
I'm a woman: I support this bill
“I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.
I don't think women should have to have an annual exam and prescription to get birth control either.
Get informed: UNICEF foreign adoption policy is killing orphans and the US gives $132 million to UNICEF every year. Stop the madness.
For the best news and commentary on the 2012 election from the GOP perspective, visit www.whitehouse12.com.
I've moved on to a better forum (scienceforums.net). Facts matter, and I don't have the time or energy for putting up with the pretense that they don't. PM me if you'd like me to get in touch with you when I'm done developing my own forum system, likely towards the end of 2013.
One thing always left out of the Viagra discussion is it's not just for the man it is also kind of important for the woman in his life too. I doubt any man takes Viagra to masturbate but then again who knows. I'm not on the stuff yet but I am getting older, maybe I should keep some on hand, kind of like a fire extinguisher, best to be prepared.
That's hilarious. The law is designed to show the ridiculousness of anti birth control laws that have been flirted with the last couple of years :lol
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Hayek - too liberal for republicans
Other: I don't support Viagra and Cialis being covered by insurance while birth control is not - both should be covered. I'm not offended by the bill and I applaud the sponsor for forcing lawmakers to discuss the inequity that currently exists. However, I do not support the bill actually being passed because two wrongs do not make a right.
Wouldn't it? Just how expensive are those pills, anyway? Surely, there are generics available by now, maybe not for Cialis, but for the others.
Can't we just turn Congress off and then turn it back on again?
"We’re going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that allow some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share. In theory, some of those loopholes were understandable, but in practice they sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying ten percent of his salary, and that’s crazy." -Reagan