• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Employers be Forced to Pay for Porn?

Should society pay for porn?

  • Yes, men should have free, risk-free avenues for sexual satisfaction too

    Votes: 5 23.8%
  • No, civil rights only apply to minority groups

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • No, the government should not pay, or force others to pay, for sex

    Votes: 2 9.5%
  • No, that is the stupidest thing I've ever heard because...

    Votes: 13 61.9%

  • Total voters
    21
“The Magnum brand is viewed as a positive lifestyle badge and positive symbol,” Mr. Daniels said. “And people are proud to show they have a Magnum condom — the large size really connotes a sense of ‘above-average prowess,’ let’s call it.”

But as the story's writer, Andrew Adam Newman points out later, the Magnum is only connoting a myth.

For all the connotations, however, it turns out that Magnum is not so large. It is the same length as standard condoms, with the same circumference at its base, Mr. Daniels said. “Some people feel more comfortable with that width, but you don’t have to be an overly endowed man to use a Magnum and enjoy it,” he added.

Read more: The Real Issue With Magnum Condoms | Global Grind



Heh, heh...

LOL Hey I use Magnums!

But not only because Im bigger than avg but because they are the only condom that has NEVER broke on me. Lifestyles and Durex SUCK!!!!!
 
“The Magnum brand is viewed as a positive lifestyle badge and positive symbol,” Mr. Daniels said. “And people are proud to show they have a Magnum condom — the large size really connotes a sense of ‘above-average prowess,’ let’s call it.”

But as the story's writer, Andrew Adam Newman points out later, the Magnum is only connoting a myth.

For all the connotations, however, it turns out that Magnum is not so large. It is the same length as standard condoms, with the same circumference at its base, Mr. Daniels said. “Some people feel more comfortable with that width, but you don’t have to be an overly endowed man to use a Magnum and enjoy it,” he added.

Read more: The Real Issue With Magnum Condoms | Global Grind



Heh, heh...

LOL Hey I use Magnums!

But not only because Im bigger than avg but because they are the only condom that has NEVER broke on me. Lifestyles and Durex SUCK!!!!!
 
No, that is the stupidest thing I've ever heard because...

Only idiots pay for porn anyway.

Not to derail...

But acquiring pornography of the same calibre as ay pornography for free is very difficult.

Men deserve subsidized masturbation.

/trollface
 
I think one of my favorites is when some peoples health care went up last year and they blamed it on the new health care LMAO
They are correct to believe that. The risk pools skewed up with the mandate, as well the mandatory coverages added to cost. The bill was a turd and just about everything agents have been warning against is coming forth.

I dont know what health care they had before but mine as gone up atleast every 3 years for the last 15 years, they act like THIS i the first and only time.
Well, I could sell a single twenty something a policy for around 110 a month with a decent deductible when I started around nine years agoe and now it's around 3 to 4 hundred with the most dramatic increases being this year. Of course coverage was getting more expensive before but that doesn't dismiss what is happening because of the bill. I will tell you, just about every cost increase was due to some government reg. along the chain.
Health insurance companies are damn near criminals in my OPINION, when it comes to health care providers there should be a cap of profit IMO.
Actually, if you want criminal charges you'll have to dig further. The HMO debacle was started in the '70s under a bill sponsored by the late senator Ted Kennedy, prices spiked around the nineties with the regulatory burden, states have ridiculous mandatory coverages on top of that, Pelosi and Reid along with every yea vote and signatory of Obamacare should honestly be in prison for their parts of the latest bill, it was grossly negligent market interference that would have landed a private businessman in jail
I used to have a link about Cleve L. Killingsworth he was/is a CEO for one of the BCBSs and I may mess this up but it will be close:

he gave himself a 26% pay increase and bonus
even though the companies numbers were down
even though they were doing lay offs
even though their income dropped 49%
and then he raised all his costumers rates!

Im not against people making money or capitalism but this is the type of **** that is making us weaker.
One bad CEO does not an industry make. Blaming him would be like blaming the insurance industry for the failure of AIG.
WHats even more sad among a lot of CEO types he is PRAISED and RESPECTED! why? because he increased his own bottom line, f the company's, f the customers, his did good so he got a pat on the back from his friends. Pathetic.
Well, again he may have been less than ethical, but then again so is forcing economically deadly regs. on an industry. The difference is that one bad company can be replaced by it's consumers but bad regs. force bad industry standards. I'll tell anyone who will listen, I was trained in the stuff and what I saw from compliance was a complete load, thousands of unnecessary steps just to keep federal and state regulators happy, get that out of the way and you have a less expensive product.
 
LOL Hey I use Magnums!

But not only because Im bigger than avg but because they are the only condom that has NEVER broke on me. Lifestyles and Durex SUCK!!!!!

Yes breakage is why you want us to think you mentioned it, but I see an ulterior motive in there.
 
Not to derail...

But acquiring pornography of the same calibre as ay pornography for free is very difficult.

Men deserve subsidized masturbation.

/trollface

As long as I get subsidized chocolate and cable.

:spank:
 
Yes breakage is why you want us to think you mentioned it, but I see an ulterior motive in there.

LOL if you do that very presumptuous since I will never met any of you, dont know what any of you look like and I have a great girl

Sorry to disappoint but its ture they are the only ones to never break in my lifetime :shrug:
 
As long as I get subsidized chocolate and cable.

:spank:

But if I don't get a proper and envigorating release I won't work, sleep, or socialize as well, it's in the national interest.
 
They are correct to believe that. The risk pools skewed up with the mandate, as well the mandatory coverages added to cost. The bill was a turd and just about everything agents have been warning against is coming forth.

Well, I could sell a single twenty something a policy for around 110 a month with a decent deductible when I started around nine years agoe and now it's around 3 to 4 hundred with the most dramatic increases being this year. Of course coverage was getting more expensive before but that doesn't dismiss what is happening because of the bill. I will tell you, just about every cost increase was due to some government reg. along the chain.
Actually, if you want criminal charges you'll have to dig further. The HMO debacle was started in the '70s under a bill sponsored by the late senator Ted Kennedy, prices spiked around the nineties with the regulatory burden, states have ridiculous mandatory coverages on top of that, Pelosi and Reid along with every yea vote and signatory of Obamacare should honestly be in prison for their parts of the latest bill, it was grossly negligent market interference that would have landed a private businessman in jail
One bad CEO does not an industry make. Blaming him would be like blaming the insurance industry for the failure of AIG. Well, again he may have been less than ethical, but then again so is forcing economically deadly regs. on an industry. The difference is that one bad company can be replaced by it's consumers but bad regs. force bad industry standards. I'll tell anyone who will listen, I was trained in the stuff and what I saw from compliance was a complete load, thousands of unnecessary steps just to keep federal and state regulators happy, get that out of the way and you have a less expensive product.

I dont agree they were right and it wasnt just ONE bad CEO that was just an example, it sadly is more common than one isolated case.

Im not a fan of everything in the new healthcare but im have to admit im super glad it happened because its a start, something needed done period and now the ball is rolling. Cancel and rewrite parts of it, add to it etc etc but im glad something, anything was done.
 
Going faster than a feral dog and not using lube is his ulterior motive.

uhm those codoms come lubed and if you are doing it right the girl is making all the lube need, no extra is required.
 
I dont agree they were right and it wasnt just ONE bad CEO that was just an example, it sadly is more common than one isolated case.

Im not a fan of everything in the new healthcare but im have to admit im super glad it happened because its a start, something needed done period and now the ball is rolling. Cancel and rewrite parts of it, add to it etc etc but im glad something, anything was done.
I can't agree with any of this. Health insurers are a massive bearaucray due to what must be done to satisfy governmnet policies, that is just a fact. There are some lousy CEOs in the health industry but it isn't as prevalent as you think, the "profit margins" that people like to demonize as well are lower than most industries, around 6%. This bill does have some minor good but it's far outweighed by a lot of crap. For instance the old standard 80/20 OOP model is now illegal due to federal statute and now it's an 85/15, this means the companies must increase their output up to deductible and out of pocket which leads to slimmer margin of error, this gets passed directly to the consumer. There are ways to fix the industry but government isn't listening to the people who know how such as agents, physicians, and payors.
 
uhm those codoms come lubed and if you are doing it right the girl is making all the lube need, no extra is required.

Some ladies are often a bit parched down below mmkay? Also... srsly, there are break resistant condom available. If not at your local drug store than on the vast selection offered by the interwebs. :)
 
Some ladies are often a bit parched down below mmkay? Also... srsly, there are break resistant condom available. If not at your local drug store than on the vast selection offered by the interwebs. :)

Sorry ive NEVER experienced this? Not saying it doesnt happen im just saying ive never encountered it longer than a couple stokes, licks etc

Like I said they make thier own lube, the condoms I get are already lubed and they dont break so I dont need any "specail break resistant condoms" in my opinion they should ALL BE BREAK RESISTANT LMAO
 
Sorry ive NEVER experienced this? Not saying it doesnt happen im just saying ive never encountered it longer than a couple stokes, licks etc

Like I said they make thier own lube, the condoms I get are already lubed and they dont break so I dont need any "specail break resistant condoms" in my opinion they should ALL BE BREAK RESISTANT LMAO

They all happen to be electronically tested to what is a govt regulated resistance.

I have personally encountered it with two females.
 
I can't agree with any of this. Health insurers are a massive bearaucray due to what must be done to satisfy governmnet policies, that is just a fact. There are some lousy CEOs in the health industry but it isn't as prevalent as you think, the "profit margins" that people like to demonize as well are lower than most industries, around 6%. This bill does have some minor good but it's far outweighed by a lot of crap. For instance the old standard 80/20 OOP model is now illegal due to federal statute and now it's an 85/15, this means the companies must increase their output up to deductible and out of pocket which leads to slimmer margin of error, this gets passed directly to the consumer. There are ways to fix the industry but government isn't listening to the people who know how such as agents, physicians, and payors.

My father is a doctor and I remember when I was young that insurance companies actually helped people.

Prior to that my dad has stories about being paid in squirrels and moonshine back in the 1940-50's (no, I'm not really that old, my dad happens to be 50 yrs older than me and I have 2 sisters in their 60's). Anyway.... my point is that people used to help each other. But I am a socialist so I don't belong in this conversation anyway................
 
I can't agree with any of this. Health insurers are a massive bearaucray due to what must be done to satisfy governmnet policies, that is just a fact. There are some lousy CEOs in the health industry but it isn't as prevalent as you think, the "profit margins" that people like to demonize as well are lower than most industries, around 6%. This bill does have some minor good but it's far outweighed by a lot of crap. For instance the old standard 80/20 OOP model is now illegal due to federal statute and now it's an 85/15, this means the companies must increase their output up to deductible and out of pocket which leads to slimmer margin of error, this gets passed directly to the consumer. There are ways to fix the industry but government isn't listening to the people who know how such as agents, physicians, and payors.

You dont have to agree, I wasnt trying to convince you I just wanted something, anything done. ANd like I said IMO a perfect healthcare system would have very little profit at all, because of its nature it doesnt need CEOs making 10s-100s of millions of dollers a year while they bend me over and take more money and offer less care year by year,

I just find it absurd that healthcare CEOs profit that much because of the industry. Again i dont know what I would do about it, I dont want to cap captilism I just miss the days of a CEO being happy with like a million dollars a year (which is crazy) VPS making like 500,00 a year and all other employees making good money like 50K plus and <big dramatic pause> the CUSTOMER GETS A GREAT PRODUCT

today it seems like CEOS only care about how much money they can squeeze in their pockets while giving you a **** product, paying employes just enough so they wont shoot up the place and dumping enough money into advertising and marketing to convince you it isnt a piece of **** as long as they can.
 
My father is a doctor and I remember when I was young that insurance companies actually helped people.

Prior to that my dad has stories about being paid in squirrels and moonshine back in the 1940-50's (no, I'm not really that old, my dad happens to be 50 yrs older than me and I have 2 sisters in their 60's). Anyway.... my point is that people used to help each other. But I am a socialist so I don't belong in this conversation anyway................
It's not a socialist/capitalist argument here. My godfather is a physician and did the same thing, he'd barter his fee as well when he had people unable to pay, he'd take anything from a home cooked dinner to ducks killed, etc. and now that is actually not permitted under many state and federal laws(which is ridiculous). It was also cheaper to insure back then because it was less expensive to treat, now hospitals have to make up for losses at the ER and other regulatory issues and hit insurers who have the deep pockets. To do the right thing by a poor patient a doctor has to waive his fee. The economics of government encroachment make it impossible for the industry to provide the best service at a fair price and it needs to change by quality ideas rather than quantity ideas.
 
You dont have to agree, I wasnt trying to convince you I just wanted something, anything done. ANd like I said IMO a perfect healthcare system would have very little profit at all, because of its nature it doesnt need CEOs making 10s-100s of millions of dollers a year while they bend me over and take more money and offer less care year by year,

I just find it absurd that healthcare CEOs profit that much because of the industry. Again i dont know what I would do about it, I dont want to cap captilism I just miss the days of a CEO being happy with like a million dollars a year (which is crazy) VPS making like 500,00 a year and all other employees making good money like 50K plus and <big dramatic pause> the CUSTOMER GETS A GREAT PRODUCT

today it seems like CEOS only care about how much money they can squeeze in their pockets while giving you a **** product, paying employes just enough so they wont shoot up the place and dumping enough money into advertising and marketing to convince you it isnt a piece of **** as long as they can.
Fair enough.
 
They all happen to be electronically tested to what is a govt regulated resistance.

I have personally encountered it with two females.

the testing only involves a sample not 100% and it as been found that PASSING batches have actually failed as high as 10%.

and sorry about your luck, maybe they just didnt like you much
 
It's not a socialist/capitalist argument here. My godfather is a physician and did the same thing, he'd barter his fee as well when he had people unable to pay, he'd take anything from a home cooked dinner to ducks killed, etc. and now that is actually not permitted under many state and federal laws(which is ridiculous). It was also cheaper to insure back then because it was less expensive to treat, now hospitals have to make up for losses at the ER and other regulatory issues and hit insurers who have the deep pockets. To do the right thing by a poor patient a doctor has to waive his fee. The economics of government encroachment make it impossible for the industry to provide the best service at a fair price and it needs to change by quality ideas rather than quantity ideas.

I had my gallbladder taken out in 1996 as emergency surgery and I was uninsured. I owed a substantial amount and I got itemized bills from the hospital, surgeon, anesthesiologist etc... the hospital was charging me something like $3.00 per guaze pad. How do suppliers get away with it?

I can understand the pharmaceutical issue to a point. They are regulated very heavily and have to contend with patent limits, research costs, studies, the FDA etc.. etc... but friggin' gauze pads?
 
the testing only involves a sample not 100% and it as been found that PASSING batches have actually failed as high as 10%.

and sorry about your luck, maybe they just didnt like you much

:eek:uch: damnnnnnnnn............
 
the testing only involves a sample not 100% and it as been found that PASSING batches have actually failed as high as 10%.

and sorry about your luck, maybe they just didnt like you much

You'll experience different female ecosystems when you branch out.
 
Back
Top Bottom