• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Guns

What do you think gun control should be like?

  • Let everyone have a gun

    Votes: 19 22.4%
  • Quick background check to purchase and carry

    Votes: 25 29.4%
  • Quick background check to purchase, but more difficult to carry

    Votes: 11 12.9%
  • Background check, waiting period for purchase and carrying.

    Votes: 17 20.0%
  • Background check, waiting period, no carrying

    Votes: 5 5.9%
  • No guns at all

    Votes: 8 9.4%

  • Total voters
    85
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have never ever been able to point to one thing I have ever said about the Constitution that is wrong. And you sir have proven that you do not even know the basic difference between the Constitution and the nations brith announcement.

Now is your time. Step up to the plate - man up - state your case - show me where I have made a mistake of fact about the Constitution. I certainly am bnot claiming I am ever wrong - but am challenging YOU to show me where I was.

Do it or man up and have the decency to stand down.



As he slaps him with a glove... "I demand satisfaction." :mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
Your understanding of rights and your attempt to diminish a right that your beloved party has pissed on for the last 80 years are rather disturbing to any freedom loving patriot

Hyperbole does not serve you.

Talking points do not serve you.

When are you actually going to debate?

I gave you two very practical examples from the First Amendment of negatives that could flow from it and how the law compromised the Amendment and what did you do? YOU IGNORED IT because you were 100% impotent to refute it.

So step up to the plate Turtle. DEBATE.
 
trying to smear a right by claiming dead schoolchildren are "heroes" of the second Amendment is pretty sickening

but like Boo you seem to come here to shower disdain on right wing gun owners without really having an point you want to make concerning the OP

I do not have to shower disdain upon anyone.

Why are you against memorializing the innocents just like we have done in many other national tragedies such as Columbine and 911?
 
As he slaps him with a glove... "I demand satisfaction." :mrgreen:
Oh I'd love to see dueling in very limited and specific circumstances brought back. The conditions would be along the lines of political slander and must be approved by the house and senate or it is not legal.
 
Your understanding of rights and your attempt to diminish a right that your beloved party has pissed on for the last 80 years are rather disturbing to any freedom loving patriot

well, when some of them join in this debate, we shall ask their opinions on the issue.
 
I do not have to shower disdain upon anyone.

Why are you against memorializing the innocents just like we have done in many other national tragedies such as Columbine and 911?

as has been explained to you many times those memorials were not directed towards an Amendment but rather the tragedy

you would only have a point if 9-11 memorials were dedicated to the heroes of "religious tolerance" or liberal Visa Provisions
 
Oh I'd love to see dueling in very limited and specific circumstances brought back. The conditions would be along the lines of political slander and must be approved by the house and senate or it is not legal.

Hey man, all you need is love.

Peace. :peace



:lamo



.
 
as has been explained to you many times those memorials were not directed towards an Amendment but rather the tragedy

you would only have a point if 9-11 memorials were dedicated to the heroes of "religious tolerance" or liberal Visa Provisions

So which right aided and abetted the killing of the people at Columbine, Virginia Tech, Ohio and far too many others to list here?
 
So which right aided and abetted the killing of the people at Columbine, Virginia Tech, Ohio and far too many others to list here?

No right whatsoever. Using firearms for illegal purposes was never a right.
 
So which right aided and abetted the killing of the people at Columbine, Virginia Tech, Ohio and far too many others to list here?

None, there is no right to kill anyone and the killers were not old enough to legally own handguns so their minority took them outside the protection of the second amendment in columbine and Chardon Ohio.


What you fail to understand that possessing a gun for the purpose of committing a crime is ILLEGAL as well and thus the second amendment has absolutely no relevance to your ranting
 
No right whatsoever. Using firearms for illegal purposes was never a right.

Lets start with something very very simple. If there were no guns in America, NOT A SINGLE ONE - how many illegal gun killings would we have each year?
 
None, there is no right to kill anyone and the killers were not old enough to legally own handguns so their minority took them outside the protection of the second amendment in columbine and Chardon Ohio.


What you fail to understand that possessing a gun for the purpose of committing a crime is ILLEGAL as well and thus the second amendment has absolutely no relevance to your ranting
Absolutely, which is why having a gun specifically in commission of a crime versus other weapons is a seperate felony rather than an upgrade to the existing charge.
 
Lets start with something very very simple. If there were no guns in America, NOT A SINGLE ONE - how many illegal gun killings would we have each year?

MOre oozing idiocy in that post. There is no right to possess crack cocaine in this country yet its all over the place

You engage in the stupidity of assuming if guns were banned-or at least not protected, killers wouldn't get them

and you complain when I note you are ignorant about this subject?
 
Lets start with something very very simple. If there were no guns in America, NOT A SINGLE ONE - how many illegal gun killings would we have each year?
Well Mr. Pro-Second amendment. The answer is simple, this is a ridiculous hypothetical with no bearing on reality and even countries with ZERO TOLERANCE gun policies have gun crime.
 
MOre oozing idiocy in that post. There is no right to possess crack cocaine in this country yet its all over the place

You engage in the stupidity of assuming if guns were banned-or at least not protected, killers wouldn't get them...

it would be a lot more difficult.
 
I'll sure all the criminals are aware of this. And yet, it doesn't stop them.

exactly, so we need to be armed because they will be.

you are figuring out why laws that prohibit possession of a weapon don't stop those who intend to commit crimes with the weapon from obtaining them
 
it would be a lot more difficult.


Only for the law abiding which of course is what those run the party that haymarket works for want
 
Well Mr. Pro-Second amendment. The answer is simple, this is a ridiculous hypothetical with no bearing on reality and even countries with ZERO TOLERANCE gun policies have gun crime.

yes, but much less than the USA, as its much more difficult for criminals to get a gun.

let's be honest: if all guns were illegal in the USA...gun crime would go waaaaaaay down.
 
Absolutely, which is why having a gun specifically in commission of a crime versus other weapons is a seperate felony rather than an upgrade to the existing charge.

Still waiting for you to step up and tell me where I was wrong about the Constitution.

btw - that is the Constitution - not our nations birth announcement which you seem to confuse with at times.
 
Lets start with something very very simple. If there were no guns in America, NOT A SINGLE ONE - how many illegal gun killings would we have each year?
I'm sorry but that doesn't hold. We can't even keep a 150# Mexican from crossing the border, what makes you think we can stop a 150# Mexican with a gun?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom