The question not is if rights are good or a particular right is good. I asked you days - VERY SPEFICALLY WITH THE EXAMPLE FROM SCHINDLERS LIST - I asked if if the Second Amendment was a PURE GOOD. Something from which no bad or negative could come. You stated that it was a PURE GOOD.
That is a ludicrous and fantasy position. And it shows just how extreme you are on this issue that will not even accept that there is good and bad with the Second Amendment.
Ask yourself this: if there was no bad at all from guns - why do we have laws against their use in certain ways?
Ask yourself this: if there was no bad at all from guns - is the suicide of a heart broken teen who just blew their brains out a good thing? Does that make part of your PURE GOOD?