If so, what would you say to people being required to make a prepayment for possible services rendered in the worst case scenario, i.e. paying ahead of time for their, possible, medical bills?
Additionally, using your logic, we should ban certain unhealthy foods, or place limits on how much can be consumed in a certain time period ... you know, because you risk medical problems such as heart attacks, diabetes etc., which would be expensive for taxpayers under current circumstances. Or perhaps people could pay ahead of time for those possible scenarios too?
I just want to be sure I am understanding the reasoning. I am wondering what solution would provide the most freedom for the individual without making it costly for taxpayers.