Therefore, you ban the improper use of such. As we already do.
Yep, the revoloutionary forces weren't as stuck in their ways as the british forces.
I agree that letting people have anything they want is too much - but I think that any bans or tight restrictions on handguns, shotguns, or rifles of any type are also too much (the other way).
And everything else should be under increasing restriction/requirement comparable with it's lethality.
Last edited by The Mark; 01-05-12 at 11:19 PM.
Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering. ~ R. Buckminster Fuller
clearly all law abiding citizens should be able to own what our own tax dollars supplies CIVILIAN law enforcement agents.
once we all can own submachine guns, 50 caliber long range "target interdiction" rifles and real assault rifles (all of which have been determined to be useful for CIVILIANS to protect them selves with in URBAN environments by various GOVERNMENTAL units) we can then argue whether NON MILITARY voters should be able to own belt fed heavy machine guns, automatic grenade launchers, hand held anti-tank rockets, STRELAS, and RPGs
Here's a signature for you TurtleDude... God didn't make all men equal, Smith & Wesson did.
Last edited by grip; 01-05-12 at 11:42 PM.
Einstein, "science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
I love the overwhelming support for the 2nd Amendment.
The Crowd is not the sum of its parts.
Neither side in an argument can find the truth when both make an absolute claim on it.