Re: Should unlicensed drivers have their vehicles towed when pulled over for an offen
That is a different case. You are talking about if the owner do not fulfill his obligations to the seller/bank. Of course then he can't keep the house, because if we let people do, then we would crush the market and massively increase prices
?????????? do you just make this stuff up? who in the hell said its about his obligations to the bank LMAO I said he committed a monetary crime so they came after his house, so NO its not different, its only different because you WANT it to be because you know it makes your silly punishing extra people logic look silly
In my case, the criminal was caught doing a random crime, and as punishment his house is seized. This is a collective punishment for his whole family, not just the criminal.
nope its just punishment to the OWNER of the house, the rest are collateral damage and thats the CRIMINALS fault, not the cop or government or who ever, this is called reality and happens every day, would I want to help them to, yep but they wouldnt get to keep the house
Because they have to interview you to check if you are not involved. So you are a suspect.
In the car, only the driver is illegal. No one else will get formal punishments.
wrong maybe the people on the car all knew he was driving illegal, maybe they forced him some how, and they all need interviewed also or at least one who is trying to drive the car.sorry you weak logic ship is sinking fast!!!!!
see isnt it fun to play what if and MAKE UP victims
Your system definitely cost more. Since, every time you stop a driver without license, you will have to find a towing company to move the car away. To move the car away costs money and it costs money for the police as well. .
WRONG again its not "my system" it is the current system in place nor have I ever stated tow
every car LOL again do you just make this stuff up on the fly or do you actually think about it?
NEXT
Again, just because they do not formally get punished do not mean they do not get punished. See my example above.
Again, you can not completely prevent collective punishment. Sometimes it is necessary. In that case, I would let the government help the family. What i want to do is to limit collective punishment, which you don't seem to care about.
ooooh so in your pretend system its ok if the government spends tons of money and it cost more in YOUR cases but not in the real system that is in place now? LOL wow dude the hypocrisy here is astounding, dont spend money on towing but spend money on keeping a whole family a float, got it
also I care tons about collective punishment I just dont buy you weak non-adult unreality based definition of collective punishment because it could cover EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING people cry about
I didn't say it was anyone else fault. I said it is not fair that third party individuals get punished for other individual actions.
they are not being punished Ive already proved this unless they are whiny children
I do not like collective punishment. Hence, I will try to limit collective punishment and seizing the car is completely unnecessary, costs more and punishes third parties for other individual actions.
you are 100% wrong it may be VERY necessary to make sure that person doesnt break the law again and who endanger people, but I guess we cant make up stories about how this guy might go home drive again that night and kill some one, we can only make up stories about how people may have to walk home and miss an important meeting LOL
Please start dealing in adult reality and not fantasy land, a cops job is hard enough and criminals get away with enough already, im all for avoiding collective punishment but it has to be REAL not whiny skinned knee look at me look at me a victim BS.
im done beating up all your little scenarios simply explain to me how the passengers are punished in reality, something that actually MATTERS that doesnt happen all the time, you havent done this once yet