• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should a rape victim be able to take the morning after pill?

Should a rape victim be able to take the morning after pill?

  • Yes, it protects her from bearing the rapist's child

    Votes: 82 92.1%
  • No, that pill is unethical

    Votes: 7 7.9%

  • Total voters
    89
The morning after pill should be available to women for whatever reason. No one has a right to decide what a woman of legal age does with her own body.
Apparently the government of today has the right to tell a woman what she can do with her own body.
 
There is at least equal, academic opinion and evidence for the morning after pill being an abortifacient. If you are pro-life and hold the usual pro-life philosophy then there is really no excuse then for accepting the morning after pill, even in situations of rape. It would simply be punishing the child for its father being a rapist.

and?

so after a women is brutally raped people in AMERICA some how think they have the right to tell and FORCE that woman to do what THEY want? LMAO

LOL sorry, to each their own but I find that laughable and totally pompous, but again in AMERICA people are free to have that OPINION but thankfully our laws dont arent written the repressive, abusive and freedom denying way
 
What do you mean so? If you are pro-life it is logically and obviously murder. All the rest of your post is just pro-choice slogans which beg the question and are pointless. If you reject the pro-life philosophy then of course you won't agree with their position on this, but why just repeat your pro-choice slogans when we are discussing what pro-lifers think and should think?
 
Last edited:
What do you mean so? If you are pro-life it is logically and obviously murder. All the rest of your post is just pro-choice slogans with beg the question and are pointless.



None of what I said is a SLOGAN its true LMAO, its factual stuff, those people think they can force a recently raped woman to do as THEY wish and not as she wishes. there no slogans there thats fact and VERY to the point LOL.

and for the record whether you are pro choice or pro life its NEVER murder

murder is a LEGAL term :shrug:

if you want to say its the killing of a ZEF, im fine with that because that would be true and accurate, saying its murder is false or a lie, pick one

or in fact saying murder is a slogan LMAO
 
Last edited:
Anyway you do as you wish because your "attacks" are very humorous, Ive never seen someone get so mad over facts :shrug:

Your shear lack of a defense is what is humorous. You throw out a definition and then come up with a conclusion based on it and won't defend that conclusion because the definition itself is a fact. You either aren't that bright or a troll or otherwise you would realize conclusions on definitions have to be defended to have merit in a debate. You pick, are you stupid or are you a troll. Pick one.
 
Last edited:
Murder is not just a legal term, it is a term used in many contexts. All you want to do is try and play the game of dueling slogans. How boring.

no murder is a legal term

unless i have assumed wrong and that would be my fault
did you just mean definition 2: something difficult or dangerous

otherwise its not murder if you are referring to anything killing related

and like I have said I have stated ZERO slogans only facts, if you care to dispute those facts let me know or continue to right them off and fail and backing up your false claim LOL
 
Your shear lack of a defense is what is humorous. You throw out a definition and then come up with a conclusion based on it and won't defend that conclusion because the definition itself is a fact. You either aren't that bright or a troll or otherwise you would realize conclusions on definitions have to be defended to have merit in a debate. You pick, are you stupid or are you a troll. Pick one.

still angry at me huh
see post 382, you fail LMAO:lamo

also by the way you are in fact trolling right now by your own admission that you plan to stalk me and attack me "internet tough guy" :laughat:

I like when I have fans :D
 
still angry at me huh
see post 382, you fail LMAO:lamo

also by the way you are in fact trolling right now by your own admission that you plan to stalk me and attack me "internet tough guy" :laughat:

I like when I have fans :D

I am not mad.

Post #382 is the same exact behavior you using before. I guess the answer to if you were a troll or an idiot is answered. You have chosen idiot. Good to know.
 
I am not mad.

Post #382 is the same exact behavior you using before. I guess the answer to if you were a troll or an idiot is answered. You have chosen idiot. Good to know.

thats an interesting opinion but the facts prove you wrong


AGAIN :D
 
thats an interesting opinion but the facts prove you wrong


AGAIN :D

:roll: I don't care about the facts of that discussion and I realize murder is a legal term. Keep on topic. We were talking about your conclusions on a definition of innocent as it pertains to a fetus, remember?
 
Last edited:
no murder is a legal term

unless i have assumed wrong and that would be my fault
did you just mean definition 2: something difficult or dangerous

otherwise its not murder if you are referring to anything killing related

and like I have said I have stated ZERO slogans only facts, if you care to dispute those facts let me know or continue to right them off and fail and backing up your false claim LOL
Murder is not just a legal term. When Stalin and Hitler murdered people they may not have been breaking the law, but it was murder nonetheless. One can certainly use murder in a way that disagrees with the law. This is just common sense. Murder is an illegitimate killing.
 
Last edited:
:roll: I don't care about the facts of that discussion and I realize murder is a legal term. Keep on topic.

I was on topic LMAO
as before you are still wrong
as before you are still mad
as before you are ignoring the facts already posted
as before you are attacking me
as before you you still cant help yourself and are still replying

:shrug:
 
Murder is not just a legal term. When Stalin and Hitler murdered people they may not have been breaking the law, but it was murder nonetheless. One can certainly use murder in a way that disagrees with the law. This is just common sense.


nope thats your OPINION and its WRONG

with out it being UNLAWFUL it is NOT murder they way you SEEM to be FALSLEY using it, thats what common sense is LOL


fact is in this country abortion is NOT murder unless you mean murder to mean by definition 2
1: the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought

2A : something very difficult or dangerous B : something outrageous or blameworthy

so you either mean definition 2 or it is in fact not murder :shrug:
 
Stop talking nonsense. If the law makes it legal to kill you though you are innocent, is that not still murder? Murder is simply illegitimate and generally premeditated homicide. Obviously someone has to define illegitimate, but that is irrelevant at this point. It has a legal definition but that is obviously not the only, general definition.

You only seem to try and debate with these silly games. Try a different strategy.
 
Last edited:
Stop talking nonsense. If the law makes it legal to kill you though you are innocent, is that not still murder? Murder is simply illegitimate and generally premeditated homicide. Obviously someone has to define illegitimate, but that is irrelevant at this point. It has a legal definition but that is obviously not the only, general definition.

You only seem to try and debate with these silly games. Try a different strategy.

the only nonsense is you ignoring facts:shrug:

if the law makes it legal to kill me, NO THAT IS NOT MURDER by definition of the word unless you mean definition two

Murder is NOT simply illegitimate and generally premeditated homicide unless you want to MAKE up the definitions of words which I choose not to do since I understand them and live in reality

The "definition" you are stating is MADE UP and only on of YOUR OPINION
You seem to want to be silly and ignore FACTS try a different strategy :shrug:

to say murder is illegitimate and generally premeditated homicide is 100% WRONG
at least in AMERICA you're wrong maybe you are right by Australia REAL definition?
 
I see no reason to repeat what I said when you are just repeating your barely coherent crap.

translation: you have no way to defend your false stance

I agree!

abortion is not murder and the law says so, this is a fact :shrug:
 
I have defended my stance. Do you really think anyone reading your comments, except the absurdly partisan, will think they aren't crap and that murder has no meaning other than the legal definition?
 
I have defended my stance. Do you really think anyone reading your comments, except the absurdly partisan, will think they aren't crap and that murder has no meaning other than the legal definition?

LMAO you have not defended anything
you gave me your opinion and I sated facts from the dictionary :Shrug:

anybody that disagrees is also wrong so they are meaningless to me

By law it is not murder :shrug: if that fact bothers you I dont know what to tell you
 
If you are going to keep posting crap, don't just repeat what you said before. Try something witty or amusing.

no need I like posting facts and watching you trying to deny them, its funny watching you call facts crap simply cause you disagree with them thats is VERY amusing :)
 
Back
Top Bottom