Yes, it protects her from bearing the rapist's child
No, that pill is unethical
Last edited by Wessexman; 12-31-11 at 10:11 PM.
"It is written in the eternal constitution that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters." - Edmund Burke
"Yes I read the 9th [amendment]. It doesn't say **** about abortion." -Jamesrage
“In politics, stupidity is not a handicap.” -Napoleon
As you wrote in YOUR perspective: The success of his sperm becoming a growing biological intrusive organism that will torment her physically and painfully for 9 months and may well kill her is (in your words) "HER child."
You left the rapist totally out of it as thought he, his rape and his DNA are non-existent.
I have no doubt you have no guilt whatsoever being pro-serial-rapists'-rights given your prior view that the only effect of pregnancy by rape is that the woman is emotionally miffed by it and otherwise reducing the victim to nothingness in message after message.
Admit it, you are absolutely for the right of a serial rapist to have as many dozens or hundreds of children as he can successfully get away with and have exactly no guilt or concern about what your rapist's rights ideology does to the females. If the little girl dies, commits suicide (common in countries were abortion is illegal, or left sterilized, you truly don't care as you say. All that matters is the rapist gets to force her to have HIS prodigy.
UNLESS she herself wants the child, your writing that the rapist's prodigy is singularly "HER CHILD" is not just a DNA and genetic LIE, it also is extremely sadistic in my opinion.
But, as you say yourself over and over again, your singular concern is that a rapist who has rapes girl to force them to have his baby should have absolutely succeeded in his goal. The girls are irrelevant you, only the rapist's right to procreate by rape. How many other excuses do you have for rapists and rapists' rights?
Any other ways you want to post messages declaring rape is, at worst, only a nuisance as is pregnancy by rape to little girls and females?
Since you OPENLY don't care if the girl commits suicide other than her killing the rapist's "child" in doing so, do you then also think he should be able to sue her estate for killing his child?
Last edited by joko104; 01-01-12 at 03:03 PM.
At least you draw the line - so far at least in your messages - to using the police, government, courts, prisons and taxpayers to enforce your personal idelogy on everyone else.
The five great lies of the
We can be Godless and free. • “Social justice” through forced redistribution of wealth. • Silencing religious opinions counts as “diversity”. • Freedom without moral and personal responsibility. • Civilization can survive the intentional undermining of the family.
I see no reason why a victim of rape should not be able to take RU-486. Forcing a woman to have the child of a rapist, is nothing more than second-class citizenship for women.