A person has an absolute right to stop a violent assault against her or him - regardless of the "guilt" of the assailant.
Obviously you have no regard for protecting the only 100% innocent one, the woman. You believe she may assaulted and harmed in every possible way, including extreme and growing pain, permanent disfigurement, denial of the right to have her own child, vagina ripped apart or stomach sliced open and even potentially crippled, sterilized, killed - with you claiming it is NOT her that is innocent, but it is his self-dna biological infestation the rapist violently thrust into her is.
But, then, men claiming a woman is someone not innocent in a rape such as you do is timeless. No reason to protect the guilty woman, only protect the procreation rights of rapists.
Despicable sense of "protecting the innocent" in my opinion.
So, what offense do you claim the woman committed for which she is not innocent? Oh, wait, you claim the ONLY effects of a rapist impregnating a woman and requiring her to carry it to term is - what'd you write? "Feelings of hatred and rage."
Doctors should be instructed to change to informing pregnant women that the ONLY concerns she should have or address in pregnancy is possible "feelings of hatred and rage." There actually are no physical effects or concerns whatsoever. Pregnancy, labor and childbirth is only an emotional thing, there is no physical element to it. Women really on scream in labor because of anger and the stretch marks and vomitting are only caused by rage. C-sections slicing her open are really just psychological therapy. Really, its all just in her head. I think that is what you just wrote.
That would have been reassuring to the now as young as 5 year old impregnated by her daily rapist father. The little slut, protect that father's innocent zygote! That is not your words or emotions for sure. But it is your moral compass in reality effect.
I believe that exactly everything of a rapist should be totally destroyed and erased in every possible manner - only limited by the woman's decisions - and rapists have exactly no, none, nada right to procreate by rape. EVER. No moral ideological circumvents that RAPISTS SHOULD ALWAYS LOSE EVERYTHING and certain procreation rights via the raping of women. Call it what you want, but your morality is that the rapist should win his goal of procreation by rape.
Why do YOU think rapists don't wear a condom 99.9% of the time? What do you think that means? What do you think the effect is if law comes to guarantee women must give birth to a child produced by rape?