As for complicity of the rapist's "zygote," despite the fact is it assaulting the woman's body, then it is your view that no parent can protect him or herself against her or anyone else's child until the child knows it intends to cause harm?
So if I could convince a child that a gun really is just a toy and won't hurt anyone, then you have no right to stop that child from gunning you down because the child isn't "complicite?"
In fact, the rapist's zygote is physically assaulting the woman every second during the pregnancy. The assault is preventing her (and her man/husband) from having their own child. The ongoing rapist's assault by his 'zygote" he forcibly injected into her can end up leaving her sterile unable to have another child. The rapist's ongoing assault likely will cost her employment time that may cause her evicted, to lose her job, etc. The rapist's zygote is going ultimately rip open her vagina more than the rape or require her stomach be slit open. The rapist's forcibly injected zygote - if not stopped - is going to cause the woman more physical pain in labor than any man can imagine. The growing foreign body of the rapist will permanently alter her body. The rapist's injected zygote may indeed kill her and with no warning.
DNA testing would confirm that the zygote IS the rapist doing the ongoing and worsening every-second of the woman's life assault.
What other rights to continuously assault the woman would you grant to rapist-men over women?