teamossil does not have an argument, has refuted and contradicted himself and his so called argument. So he will just try to change the argument so he can argue some more. He has no point, at this point, the case he tried to make has not only been refuted by you but himself. So it is "internet argument" time. Which is the reason I thought I'd ask a simple common sense question to see if he had the stones to "try" to answer it. Which was, aside from helping demonstrate the stated case in opposition to voter ID laws has been debunked with his assistance, what case it is he thinks he has made?
I believe any thinking rationale person, regardless their political lean can see that the answer to the questions is, another long winded multi week "internet argument". That lacks any intellectual honesty but does demonstrate that you can lead a donkey to water but you can't make that donkey drink. Particularly when that donkey had no intentions of quenching his intellectual thirst in the first place. It's just the fact that he has no real argument, though I'll bet you real money he will still keep arguing none the less. You don't need to be clairvoyant to predict that.