celticwar17
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2011
- Messages
- 6,540
- Reaction score
- 2,524
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
View attachment 67119828 Or View attachment 67119829
P.s. I have no Idea why there is another image... I don't know how to get it off lol
the media takes things Palin says and puts their left wing spin on to make it sound like she said something stupid when actually that wasnt the case.......with Nancy however, the media doesnt report or quote things she says because they are some of the most idiotic things to come out of a human beings mouth
The images are no hyperbole... If it was ... you would have assume I would choose that both are ridiculous... but I actually think one is and o0ne isnt....As far as physical appearance ... despite your cherry picked images both are feminine and attractive. Keep in mind Nancy is 72 years of age. Sarah is mid forties and very pretty no doubt. Your pictures were hyperbole and misrepresent each of them!
Both women in their own way are patriotic and believe they are doing what is best for the United States of America despite their obvious blunders.
They are different types of ridiculous ...
Nancy is probably high IQ and driven albeit very partisan. She has made some good moves and foolish ones.
Sarah is an average to low IQ who enjoys the spotlight and although not well read or versed on issues ... she believes her folksy pov is good for America and she has a charm. She is very athletic and attractive ... she was in over her head and was outwitted quickly.
I will say both parties have many intellectual and phenomenal women as public servants and neither of these women represent their respective parties in the best light.
I can think of so many women in each party I admire ... neither of these women make my list!
Both are marginalized imho ...
whats your favorite?
\As far as physical appearance ... despite your cherry picked images both are feminine and attractive. Keep in mind Nancy is 72 years of age. Sarah is mid forties and very pretty no doubt. Your pictures were hyperbole and misrepresent each of them!
Both women in their own way are patriotic and believe they are doing what is best for the United States of America despite their obvious blunders.
They are different types of ridiculous ...
Nancy is probably high IQ and driven albeit very partisan. She has made some good moves and foolish ones.
Sarah is an average to low IQ who enjoys the spotlight and although not well read or versed on issues ... she believes her folksy pov is good for America and she has a charm. She is very athletic and attractive ... she was in over her head and was outwitted quickly.
I will say both parties have many intellectual and phenomenal women as public servants and neither of these women represent their respective parties in the best light.
I can think of so many women in each party I admire ... neither of these women make my list!
Both are marginalized imho ...
the media takes things Palin says and puts their left wing spin on to make it sound like she said something stupid when actually that wasnt the case.......with Nancy however, the media doesnt report or quote things she says because they are some of the most idiotic things to come out of a human beings mouth