Yes, they very much represent their complaints & agenda.
They represent some of their complaints & agenda, but also have their own unique/radical ideas.
Not really, their ideas are more represent the complaints & goals of the poor and radicals.
Not at all! They only speak for a radical fringe!!
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.
Government Can't Fix That!1/3 of Americans living in poverty?
Government Can't Fix That!the increasing gap between rich & poor?
I was able to get a home loan this year *shrug*the fact that the banks got massive bail-outs but have not returned to pre-Recession lending?
How does this affect them exactly?the Bush tax-cuts on the wealthy?
Its a corporations goal to make profits. If they can go with less people and make better profits, thats business.the fact that corporations have record profits but still ain't hiring?
I have a question, you seem to put all the blame on the banks .. but didn't the home owner also sign a contract and have a copy of it ? That should be easy to produce as his/ her record of payments.
Personally I don't give a royal flying f**k who has an interest in the loan, once it has been documented that you have not made payments, then you have not upheld your side of the terms of the contract, and that house no longer belongs to you. If there is confusion as to who holds the note on the property fine .. let those parties fight it out. But if you as the property owner have not lived up to your obligations, then you have lost that home ..
you can try all you want to twist things around to suit your I hate the rich .. and I have no responsibility propaganda the bottom line is really very simple . You make you payments you keep your home .. you don't make your payment you lose your home .
no one, especially not the Occupy folks, are saying that you should not be expected to pay your mortgage
what is being said is that government should quit letting the mortgage lender take shortcuts to commence foreclosure
when the lender can evidence default, and the documents required to prove the lender is entitled to sell the underlying collateral at foreclosure sale, then the lender can and should proceed
what should not happen is to allow some lender to sell your property thru foreclosure where that lender is unable to establish before the court, consistent with the Note and mortgage documents, that it possesses the Note and assignment of interest documents proving that bank is entitled to recover against the collateral
prudent lending requires mortgagees to have such documentation present in the event legal action must be taken against the mortgagor
but allowing robo documents to be used before the court, fraudulently "proving" the lender is the legitimate party to proceed with foreclosure sale is something which should not be allowed to happen. the lender should not be allowed to fabricate its "evidence"
that is Occupy's objection. seems more than reasonable
Matthew 10:34Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
so, pay me the $70 that remains due'
and i reasonably say 'show me something from the person i originally owed the debt that you are now the true assignee of the outstanding debt.
do that and i will pay you.' until then, got a joint to smoke while we wait?
The Iraq Veterans against the War get it though:
From 3 days ago - Iraq Veterans Against The War Releases New Statement: The 1 Percent Is Profiting From Our Sacrifices
Treat the earth well: it was not given to you by your parents, it was loaned to you by your children. We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors, we borrow it from our Children. ~ Ancient American Indian Proverb