• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How long before media finds Gingrich scandal to report on?

When will the media break a Newt Gingrich scandal?

  • This week (before Nov 21st)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .
Can you be specific to what "garbage" you don't agree with? The one about falwell or founders.

The one about all pastors being racists for one. Christianity promoting hate and bigotry for two. And yes, the founders, for three. You're essentially wrong on all counts.
 
I foolishly expected this to be about Gingrich. There's no need to look for new stuff, just riffing through his back catalogue should be sufficient.
 
All pastors are racists. Jerry Falwell was one of the biggest racists/misogynists ever. Christianity promotes hate and bigotry. That's why our founders and many of our presidents like lincoln were atheists.
This is total BS, that is not true at all. Some may be, most are not. That's coming from a non religious fellow.
 
The one about all pastors being racists for one. Christianity promoting hate and bigotry for two. And yes, the founders, for three. You're essentially wrong on all counts.

But you agree about falwell and it doesn't matter what pastor obama is associated with?
 
But you agree about falwell and it doesn't matter what pastor obama is associated with?

So it DOES matter who is connected to Fallwell but it doesn't matter who Obama is connected to? You contradicted yourself in such a small sentence. Your abject hyper-partisanship is showing along with your "less than stellar" education.
 
So it DOES matter who is connected to Fallwell but it doesn't matter who Obama is connected to? You contradicted yourself in such a small sentence. Your abject hyper-partisanship is showing along with your "less than stellar" education.


No i didn't. I said it doesn't matter who is connect to falwell, wright or anyone else for that matter because they are all loons. I was asking him if he agreed with my assertion about him. Looks like you need some reading comprehension lessons.
 
No i didn't. I said it doesn't matter who is connect to falwell. I was asking him if he agreed with my assertion about him. Looks like you need some reading comprehension lessons.

You stated Falwell was a racist and seem to care about racist pastors yet when Obama's pastor is called out, you state it doesn't matter... Dont see how that's contradictory?
 
You stated Falwell was a racist and seem to care about racist pastors yet when Obama's pastor is called out, you state it doesn't matter... Dont see how that's contradictory?

You still aren't getting it. I said that they are were racist and i dont care if any candidate is associated with him. John mccain was endorsed by hagee who made some questionable antisemtic comments but i don't think we should make a big deal about it mccains connection to him. It doesn't matter what pastor anyone is connected to. They are all the same. That's the whole point i was trying to make.
 
You still aren't getting it. I said that they are were racist and i dont care if any candidate is associated with him. John mccain was endorsed by hagee who made some questionable antisemtic comments but i don't think we should make a big deal about it mccains connection to him. It doesn't matter what pastor anyone is connected to. They are all the same. That's the whole point i was trying to make.

Then why being it up? Plus, they aren't all the same.
 
Then why being it up? Plus, they aren't all the same.

Because some people tend to think only barak obama is linked to racist pastors. Every single republican has tried to get an endorsment from falwell. Barak obama's "connections" aren't an issue.
 
Last edited:
Now That Newt Gingrich tops the PPP poll of republican presidential candidates and is 2nd in the latest CNN survey, how long do you think it will take before the main stream media finds a scandal involving him to report on?

I have no doubt it won't take long for the media to make him their favorite taget... I would say they start targeting him sometime this week and by next Monday, after the Sunday morning political show, he will be at the top of their list of republicans to trash.

he's already got one out there........hanging clinton while he himself was having an affair with his third wife.
 
Really! Newt Gingrich matters again? I don't think we need any scandals for Gingrich. He is not going to gain any lasting traction.
 
The media didn't say much about Obama being the member of a racist church, witha racist preacher for 20 years; nor his friendship with known domestic terrorists; nor his connection with an illegal land deal.

gosh, then how did we all know where obama attended church?
 
Really! Newt Gingrich matters again? I don't think we need any scandals for Gingrich. He is not going to gain any lasting traction.

well.....he's sure has been showing his giant head everywhere, talking about being a grandpa. working on softening his image, i guess.
 
Because some people tend to think only barak obama is linked to racist pastors. Every single republican has tried to get an endorsment to falwell. Barak obama's "connections" aren't an issue.

Every single Republican? You sure?

Some people still think we are geocentric, what's your point?
 
gosh, then how did we all know where obama attended church?

That's another thing. The people criticizing obama for being a member of wright's church are the same ones calling him muslim. Which is it?
 
Every single Republican? You sure?

Some people still think we are geocentric, what's your point?

That was a bit of an exaggeration on my part but yes in modern times that has been the case.

And I'm not sure why you are bringing up the geocentric crap. I was just trying to point out the hypocrisy in criticizing obama's supposed "connections" and i get criticized by liberals and conservatives.
 
Last edited:
Correct, it's more along the lines of his John Edwards moment.

Nah, that doesn't work. Without a note of the macabre an affair is pretty ho-hum stuff.
 
gosh, then how did we all know where obama attended church?

Yeah, It was all over the news. As far as his loose connection with the likes of William Ayers, a man that has neither the modesty towards his past, nor the insights of a post-radical elementary school teacher, the connection was too small to merit discussion.
 
Yeah, It was all over the news. As far as his loose connection with the likes of William Ayers, a man that has neither the modesty towards his past, nor the insights of a post-radical elementary school teacher, the connection was too small to merit discussion.

I attended the same university ayers teaches at. Does that mean i have ties to him? All obama did was set on a board with him? If you are part of the education system in chicago you know who ayers is. No way around that.
 
Yeah, It was all over the news. As far as his loose connection with the likes of William Ayers, a man that has neither the modesty towards his past, nor the insights of a post-radical elementary school teacher, the connection was too small to merit discussion.

If Obama exhibited racist behavior, or supported legislation or policy that was racist, then his connection to Ayers would be...illuminating. Otherwise it's entirely peripheral and no more relevant than your own connection to your embarrassing, racist grandmother who's set in her ways and just "telling it like it is."
 
Oh gosh, I guess it happened already. Boy, was I incorrect. I guess Newt didn't really take the money for lobbying, right?
(Is this poll still working? I hope so.)
.
 
Last edited:
How long before the media finds a Gingrich scandal? Probably about negative 17 years.
Exactly. He's been around awhile and has plenty of skeltons to pull out. I think he hopes for short memories and the always reliable (for the faithful) the media is picking me ruse. :doh
 
Exactly. He's been around awhile and has plenty of skeltons to pull out. I think he hopes for short memories and the always reliable (for the faithful) the media is picking me ruse. :doh
But the lobbying stuff for $1,600,000 is a recent activity. Oh, but it must be made up by the liberal news, right?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom