You mean the US Army occupying their property? The gall....
We've been over this. South Carolina seceding did not represent transfer of title to Ft. Sumter.
The Confederate guns in Charleston pounding the hell out of Fort Sumter damn sure did, though. Major Anderson lawfully surrendered the fort to the Confederates. Pudy much made it Confederate property, at that point.
Not to mention, the fort's guns threatened the safety of civilians in Charleston.
Originally Posted by poweRob
Interpreting the constitution is the sole job of the SCOTUS. That is what they are there for.
Originally Posted by apdst
Ok...where does Article 3 of The Constitution say interpret?