He even gets the point and the shortcomings of the AOC wrong somehow. They didn't put the most power in the feds hands with Constitution as he implies, but instead merely changed up the order of the people and the state. The fed kept its spot at the bottom of the pole like it was before but in his unlimited amount of stupidity he decided that a part of the constitution that was merely the introduction meant the fed was the big boy in the room when nothing in the paper or the founders words on the matter say anything of the sort. In short he was a dumbass.And when these Articles were found to be inadequate to the exigencies of the country, the Constitution was ordained "to form a more perfect Union." It is difficult to convey the idea of indissoluble unity more clearly than by these words. What can be indissoluble if a perpetual Union, made more perfect, is not?