bigots like you make me giggle too...
can't help it...i'm easily entertained.
such logic of course, 100% counters the concept of respecting property rights.
bears, bulls, white sox fan 4 life!!!
as with everything surrounding the war, there are arguments and precedents that support both sides.
to claim that CSA "supporters" disregard property rights is really a false claim... and what you are really trying to do here is pulling the usual " hypocrite" card.. and certainly not debate the issue.
a CSA "supporter" can argue that property rights granted and/or protected by Union law are irrelevant.. as the laws of the Union were done away with by the CSA.
they can simply argue that the property inherently changed hands when a new sovereign was appointed over the geographical boundaries.
you know.. just like we did when we seceded from the UK.
unless you are going to argue that our land is still the property of the UK, you would have to assign validity to that view.