No! We need 24/7 coverage until the Movement succeeds!
Anti-OWS, but I like arguing about it.
Pro-OWS, but I'm getting tired of arguing about it.
Anti-OWS, sick of hearing about it.
Not taking sides, just plain sick of it all.
The question is more important than the answer!
So..... what does that teach younger generations? You can be a drug abusing bum and let those who make the decision to work hard take care of you? Why not a message of personal responsibility rather than a message that support bumming and freeloading?But even if they didn't have that obligation, it would still be in their best interest to endorse a moderate amount of government redistribution of wealth to keep the imbalance from growing too large.
If you say so.In the early '30s there was a real danger that either a Russian style socialist revolution would sweep over America, or America would descend into fascism in the attempt to suppress that threat. The main reason neither of those things happened was because of the New Deal. Economists will debate forever whether the New Deal did anything to ameliorate the Great Depression, but the redistribution of wealth that it represented took the wind out of the sails of the growing socialist movement. It's why Germany got Hitler and you didn't.
And why in the world would you want a feminist society?
What I don't understand about what they did (or wanted to do) today....why would they want to occupy the subways? How does that help in the battle against the 1%?
"We all of us know down here that politics is a tough game. And I don't think there's any point in being Irish if you don't know that the world is going to break your heart eventually."-Daniel Patrick Moynihan, December 5, 1963