• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should the Poor not be allowed to vote

Should the Poor not be allowed to vote

  • The poor should be banned from voting

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • The richest 10% should be banned from voting

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • The top 1% should be banned from voting

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • Only the middle class should be allowed to vote

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3
If you are going to use they didn't have that back or the it was a different time argument to **** on the constitution or the ideas of the authors of our constitution then this applies to everything else in the constitution.

only if your a moron! You think the British held true to the magna carta or the doomsday book? No they evolved the laws over time! I think if the founders fathers would of expected the document to be adapted over time.
 
only if your a moron!

Only a moron would go but they didn't have that in 1787 or that didn't exist back then as a reason for ignoring the constitution.

You think the British held true to the magna carta or the doomsday book? No they evolved the laws over time! I think if the founders fathers would of expected the document to be adapted over time.
We have amendment process if you wish for the meaning to changed, an amendment to be removed or a right to be added. You just do not ignore the intentions of the founding forefathers and use some bull **** its a living document lie to justify ****ting on the constitution.
 
Only a moron would go but they didn't have that in 1787 or that didn't exist back then as a reason for ignoring the constitution.


We have amendment process if you wish for the meaning to changed, an amendment to be removed or a right to be added. You just do not ignore the intentions of the founding forefathers and use some bull **** its a living document lie to justify ****ting on the constitution.


lol what ever you say pal.
 
yeah, and are income is taxed to pay for it.

Again SS and Medicare are taken out of your income to pay for for SS and Medicare.
 
yes, I am glad we agree. our income is taxed to pay for Medicare and Social Security.

And to pay for our stupid liberal wars in which liberal blame Bush, but ran on a ticket for change.
 
all Americans who have a job pay income taxes for SS and Medicare.

And the ones who don't have a job, who just get handed money every month... don't.
 
yes, I am glad we agree. our income is taxed to pay for Medicare and Social Security.

Which has nothing to do actual income taxes.
 
what liberal wars are you reffering to?

Wake up from your comma. Obama is continuing Bus's wars.


Yet liberals promised us change...which turned into a pathetic excuse of more of the same.
 
Last edited:
I messed it up...I should have included everyone should be able to vote....I couldnt go back and change it unfortunately.....sorry bout that
 
Wake up from your comma. Obama is continuing Bus's wars.


Yet liberals promised us change...which turned into a pathetic excuse of more of the same.

so the Iraq conflict and the Afghan conflict were and are stupid wars?
 
Wake up from your comma. Obama is continuing Bus's wars.


Yet liberals promised us change...which turned into a pathetic excuse of more of the same.
Bush's wars? I don't think so. USA's wars would be more accurate to me. I mean, who ever was or will be president of USA, their politcal system won't change at all. At least since B. Clinton era i haven't seen any change at all.


so the Iraq conflict and the Afghan conflict were and are stupid wars?
Afghan one not but Iraq's ones was a non sense war. They attacked Iraq because they claimed that Iraq had chemical weapons which they never found.
Besides from close information of my mates who served in Iraq i am more convicted then media that Iraq's war was due to oil business.
 
Last edited:
Bush's wars? I don't think so. USA's wars would be more accurate to me. I mean, who ever was or will be president of USA, their politcal system won't change at all. At least since B. Clinton era i haven't seen any change at all.



Afghan one not but Iraq's ones was a non sense war. They attacked Iraq because they claimed that Iraq had chemical weapons which they never found.
Besides from close information of my mates who served in Iraq i am more convicted then media that Iraq's war was due to oil business.


All the BS aside I think we did a good thing in Iraq. During my year in Basra I got to meet some great people and they all seemed very happy wityh the progress that was being made. Of course we had our share of trouble but on the whole I think our occupation was a positive thing for the averege Iraq citizen.
 
Bush's wars? I don't think so. USA's wars would be more accurate to me. I mean, who ever was or will be president of USA, their politcal system won't change at all. At least since B. Clinton era i haven't seen any change at all.

This is the average Republican response which is flat out dumb.

How many 9/11 terrorists came from, Iraq?

You do realize that you killwed over 4,000 Americans to bring Sharia Law to Iraq? Unfortunately, Republicans have a penchant for killing innocent people as long as they are in power and liberals are no better.

You people are a disgrace to humanity.
 
Last edited:
All the BS aside I think we did a good thing in Iraq. During my year in Basra I got to meet some great people and they all seemed very happy wityh the progress that was being made. Of course we had our share of trouble but on the whole I think our occupation was a positive thing for the averege Iraq citizen.
I agree on this point too.
Indeed i blaim USA for the way they start the attack and not for what they did after in Iraq.
 
I agree on this point too.
Indeed i blaim USA for the way they start the attack and not for what they did after in Iraq.

yep politicians start wars, soldiers just do what they are trained to do and try to be the best that they can be
 
I didnt add that because I thought that was a given :) but your right sam...I dont see a way to add another poll option now :(
I think you should have added: "Turtledude shouldn't be able to vote."
 
Back
Top Bottom