• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Euthanasia for the use of humans.

See O


  • Total voters
    29
It is only out of selfishness that we refuse to allow people to die how they wish. I will have my cat killed when she becomes too sick to have a good quality of life. She is getting old, and she has medical problems. Medication helps her for now, but less and less as time goes on. I have already decided what my course of action will be when she is too sick to enjoy her life. I've decided I will arrange a home vet visit, and allow her to have privacy if she wants it, as cats frequently do when they are preparing to die. It will be hard for me - I'd rather hold her - but it's not my life.

And I bet absolutely no one here thinks that is crazy or unusual. Most of you would do the same.

So what's the roadblock when it comes to people? Why, pbrauer, is anyone "obligated" to be miserable for your benefit and comfort?

People wish to commit suicide for all kinds of reasons. Often times, the decision is made quite rationally. This is what I mean about this skewed picture people have of suicide. Most of the time, people don't just wake up one day and want to die. And if they do, this is what the basic psych eval is for.

People in immediate psychiatric crisis, with little or no history of it from the past, can often be helped quickly and lead a good quality of life. This should be pursued, and then the request for euthanasia re-evaluated. You will find that most of these people no longer wish to die - they often had a catalyst causing their feelings, like trauma, onset of disease either mental or physical, or even just a reaction to a drug (legal or not).

But for someone with a long, repeated history of non-functional mental illness that does not respond to treatment, euthanasia should be granted. We look at mental illness as being a "lesser" disease to other disease. As though, because the body is healthy, the state of the brain is irrelevant. Sometimes, mental illness is fatal. Yes, suicide is a fatal outcome of mental illness. Other times, it creates a life of endless and untreatable suffering - just like many other neurological diseases.

But it hardly matters what the reason is. If you want to die Maude-style, fine by me. For those of you who haven't seen the cult classic Harold and Maude (SPOILER ALERT), Maude is a relatively healthy 79-year-old woman who decides to commit suicide on her 80th birthday. Why? By her own account, because she's had 80 good years, and that's enough for her. It's all downhill from here anyway.

That does not strike me as irrational. She is just less afraid of death than most.

Here's the thing about it: people assume that mentally healthy people are rational. We aren't.

Mildly depressed people have a more realistic and accurate predictive ability. Mentally healthy people tend to have a "positive delusion" that skews their estimates - thus why people gamble. Our fear of death and our myths surrounding it are fear-based, and completely irrational. Intellectually, death is just another life cycle. And it's probably a lot less painful than some of the things I've lived through. I have no reason to be afraid of death... and yet I am anyway. There's a reason for this irrationality - it helps us survive. It helps us want to keep living. But we're intellectual enough to know when it's time to give up the fight for whatever the reason may be.

Your healthy mindset about death is irrational. It's also selfish for you to think first about how it will affect you when considering someone else's quality of life. It's condescending for you to think anyone who is ready to die must be insane - or that even if they are, their feelings are somehow less valid and their own experience of life irrelevant. It's cruel for you to opt to force them to live in misery and pain instead of allowing them to have some agency.
 
Last edited:
I do urge you to read the posts in this thread.

Am I misunderstanding the argument? I ask in all sincerity. I see a couple potential components to the discussion.
 
Are people really wanting to, what, force doctors to kill people?

No forcing required. It is actually quite common for doctors to kill terminal patients. It's illegal, of course, but it happens anyway.

They are first and foremost obligated to do no harm. Sometimes, keeping someone alive does more harm than granting them death.

If a doctor does not wish to grant someone euthanasia, the patient can be provided with another means of doing it or another doctor.
 
Am I misunderstanding the argument? I ask in all sincerity. I see a couple potential components to the discussion.

I would be completely against any doctor being "forced" into something like this. I think only doctors who are willing to do this should. Even then, I expect would them to show the patient how to do it, rather than the doctor do it himself/herself.
 
I doubt any doctor could be "forced" to euthanize. Doctors would have a choice to do it, or not. Some would be repulsed by the idea, and that's fine.
 
I'd just as soon skip the last trip to the hospital--but not the second to last one.

But the passing of a loved one is not about us, but about them and how to help them best. If being with them is best for them, then I will be there.
 
But the passing of a loved one is not about us, but about them and how to help them best. If being with them is best for them, then I will be there.
I meant my last and second to last trips, not those of someone I love.

I'd just as soon pass somewhere other than a hospital when the time comes.
 
I meant my last and second to last trips, not those of someone I love.

I'd just as soon pass somewhere other than a hospital when the time comes.

Sorry for the mistake. I need better reading comprehension some days. My apologies, most of all because I certainly agree.
 
Am I misunderstanding the argument? I ask in all sincerity. I see a couple potential components to the discussion.

I don't know if you are misunderstanding or not. There are no posts in this thread that even imply that doctors should be forced to perform euthanasia or assisted suicide, only posts which opine that it should not be illegal if they choose to do so in accordance with the patient's wishes. There are also many posts describing why people believe this should be legal. I don't know what other components you are referring to. You either believe people have a right to a death with dignity at the time and with the method of their choosing, or you don't believe people have that right.
 
It's all easy to say...until it's you!
 
It's all easy to say...until it's you!

What would be "hard" is NOT having euthanasia as an option...when it's "me" on the deathbed. I'm arguing FOR euthanasia to make "easy" on "me."
 
I do urge you to read the posts in this thread.

You're right. I have read all the posts in this thread, now, and I probably should have done it earlier. Philosophically, euthanasia is a tough one for me. I totally understand the arguments for it. I had to have one of my dogs put down a while ago. I don't mean to compare the importance of death of an animal (although I do love my animals) to the importance of a death of a person, but I do understand why it's done, why I had to make that decision for my dog. Not because I wanted her to die, I wish I still had her here, but because she had suffered a bad brain injury and she would not get any better and, for her sake, I had to let her go.*

All that being said, I, too, worry about somebody being made to feel like they're a burden and being "encouraged" to consider death. Also, I don't believe medical professionals should be required to do this if it's not what they believe in. I know that, due to my religious beliefs, I couldn't do it (then again I'm not in the medical profession). Speaking of religious beliefs, I also have a strong bias in favor of life.*

Still, other than my experience with my dog, this is largely a theoretical and theological discussion for me (for now anyway), and I cannot be so arrogant as to say my theories and theology mean more than any persons actual experiences. I think this is an area where all I really have the right to do is make my decisions for my own life, as well as let the people I love know that I'd never consider caring for them a burden if it means I get to be around them for as long as possible. When and if it comes to a decision between life and death, *that that needs to be a decision between the person, their family and their God if they believe in one.

On a personal note, DiAnna, I did not know your personal story until I read it here. It literally brought a lump to my throat. I totally understand and respect what you've posted on this and I hope I have written anything here that makes you think otherwise. *
 
Last edited:
I'd never ask someone who loved me. Seems like a terrible memory to leave them with.

But on the other hand it could be a beautiful thing.. I mean if you are suffering and in pain and wish to go? Who better to do it than your loved ones? I think in cases of terminal illness that it may be better for them to take on that role to helping you slip away over watching you squrim around in pain . I think it could be a very beautiful thing and will go so far as to say an honor for someone to ask you to help them die and to make sure they die in the correct way.
 
...On a personal note, DiAnna, I did not know your personal story until I read it here. It literally brought a lump to my throat. I totally understand and respect what you've posted on this and I hope I have written anything here that makes you think otherwise. *

You know I care for you Xy, but your beliefs do not make me think otherwise. I am dying, and your beliefs will make me suffer for months in a way you cannot understand unless you are in my skin, gasping for every breath, suffering for weeks, months, long beyond what you would allow a beloved pet to suffer. I have the right to die with dignity, at a time and in the maner of my own choosing. You do not understand the horror, the helplessness, the agony of my suffering. People have the right to decide when and how they will die, so that they will not suffer horrific, lingering agony.

I know you are confused, torn between your religion and your reality. I am a spirtual person, not a religious person. Please, do not confuse the agony of the dying with the hope of the deceased.
 
Last edited:
I don't usually make emotional arguments like this, but...

...to me denying euthanasia to critically ill and/or suffering patients is just mean and selfish.

I feel the same way about (legitimate) medical marijuana, btw.
 
only if it's voluntary
 
All that being said, I, too, worry about somebody being made to feel like they're a burden and being "encouraged" to consider death. Also, I don't believe medical professionals should be required to do this if it's not what they believe in. I know that, due to my religious beliefs, I couldn't do it (then again I'm not in the medical profession). Speaking of religious beliefs, I also have a strong bias in favor of life.*

You could say the same thing about people on life support, and their families being "encouraged" to pull the plug. Does the remote possibility that someone might do that outweigh the cruelty of keeping someone bedridden with a machine pumping their heart for 30 years? No. That's why families are allowed to make those decisions.

Likewise, the remote possibility that some sociopath may try to pressure someone does not outweigh the cruelty of forcing terminal or untreatable people to suffer indefinitely, or how simply wrong it is to tell someone they're not allowed to make their own life decisions no matter what the reason is.

This idea that terminal and untreatable patients die natural deaths is mythical. We are capable of keeping someone alive way, way longer than they would normally live with whatever disease they have.

You want to talk about pressure? We pressure terminal people into persuing every time-buying treatment they can, even if their quality of life continues to degrade and it does nothing but force them to suffer for longer. And who do we do that for? We don't do it for them, the person suffering. We do it for us. We're afraid of losing people. Now that is cruel and coercive.

Doctors should certainly be able to refuse to euthanize if another doctor can take up the case, or if an effective, simple, and humane means of suicide can be provided to the patient.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom