View Poll Results: See O

Voters
30. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    24 80.00%
  • No

    6 20.00%
  • Rootabega

    0 0%
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 69

Thread: Euthanasia for the use of humans.

  1. #41
    User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    So. Cal.
    Last Seen
    01-08-12 @ 09:12 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    52

    Re: Euthanasia for the use of humans.

    Quote Originally Posted by Whoppletraps View Post
    If people want to die they should be able to, especially if they're in a painful situation.
    Then why not spend the money on making their lives less painful. Give them all the painkillers they need, work on pain to conquer that, work on being kinder to one another for the several other reasons people want to die, like depression and loneliness. Why are we in such a hurry to legalize killing rather than making living the better option?

  2. #42
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Gina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:37 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    31,869

    Re: Euthanasia for the use of humans.

    Quote Originally Posted by Juiposa View Post
    Do you support the idea of using Euthanasia on humans? If so in what circumstances.


    IMO, yes, euthanasia should be legalised to be used on humans. Many conservatives argue the right to life in abortion issues, so why not have a right to death. A cancer patient who has been slowly withering away for years on treatment, and has given up and wants to die. What gives anyone the authority to deny a person who his in extreme pain and suffering that has no hope of recovering the painless death they want? If I was guaranteed to be stuck in a hospital bed for the rest of my life, I would want to die.

    Not only would it be helping a person get away for pain, it would be saving money. If a person wanted to be euthanised instead of be hospitalised for months on end, it would save the government (in the US's case, insurance companies) thousands of dollar that would have been used to keep that person alive.

    Given people the right to be able to die painlessly than slowly of cancer or some other disease would be wonderful. Of course anything this drastic would still need regulations as to when you can be euthanised.
    Yes, I believe in death with dignity. This issue has effected and is now effecting my family. Both members suffered/suffering terrible pain and anxiety at the end with their cancers. Since neither lived/lives in Oregon, their only choice was/is to go it until the end. The one now passed, seriously considered moving here once his cancer was diagnosed. It was impractical for several reasons, not the least of which was his insurance coverage for treatment until his death.

    I voted three times for Oregon's law and it finally was allowed to stand.

    Maybe neither could/would actually go through with assisted suicide, but at least it would have been an option. Many here go through the approval process, but don't follow through. I think it is just the comfort of having the choice in their hands, should it become too awful to live with.

    The other day, there was a passing in my town, where it was made obvious in the obituary that the deceased chose this route, to die surrounded by family and loved ones, laughing and joking until the end. That is so much better to me, than the death my uncle suffered. Alone in the middle of the night, because his family had gone home to rest that evening.

    It is better than the death my other family member is suffering as I write this. Painkillers and anti-anxiety drugs are having no effect.
    Last edited by Gina; 10-16-11 at 08:24 PM.
    I don't attack my constituents. Bob is my constituent now.
    This is the important stuff. We canít get lost in discrimination. We canít get lost in B.S. We canít get lost tearing each other down. I want to make a point here that no matter what you look like, where you come from, how you worship, who you love, how you identify, and yeah, how you run, that if you have good public policy ideas, if you are well qualified for office, bring those ideas to the table, because this is your America, too. This is our commonwealth of Virginia, too.
    Danica Roem - The nation's first openly transgender person elected to serve in a U.S. state legislature.

  3. #43
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Last Seen
    12-10-12 @ 07:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    12,316

    Re: Euthanasia for the use of humans.

    Quote Originally Posted by petaluna View Post
    Then why not spend the money on making their lives less painful. Give them all the painkillers they need, work on pain to conquer that, work on being kinder to one another for the several other reasons people want to die, like depression and loneliness. Why are we in such a hurry to legalize killing rather than making living the better option?
    These are not mutually exclusive goals, Petaluna.

  4. #44
    Dungeon Master
    Hooter Babe

    DiAnna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Northern California
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,590
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Euthanasia for the use of humans.

    Quote Originally Posted by lpast View Post
    There ya go, thats what makes the entire argument kind of moot...anyone can end their life at the time of their choosing basically....the only question is should the law allow them to be assisted in achieving their goal.
    Yes, it should... and this is why. Although people do indeed have the ability to kill themselves, they usually do not have the means to do so cleanly, quickly and with dignity.

    Everyone here knows my story, so I'll use myself as an example again. I am dying. My lungs are failing, and I will not put myself on the transplant list because I couldn't live with the thought of taking organs that a younger person, one who has a longer life prospect and perhaps dependent children, might need. So I will die. Thanks to the government making laws restricting my right to end my life, suicide is illegal. Therefore, if anyone helps me die a quiet, dignified death, they will be charged and imprisoned. So I am left to my own devices.

    Here is what I must consider: When to do it? I'm already deeply restricted in what activity I can do and my mobility is limited. Still, I'm able to chat on the computer, play video games, talk to my children over the phone (or more honestly, listen to them chat because talking does literally take my breath away). I might be able to do these things for another couple of years. I may not. However, if I wait until I am unable to do any of these things, I will also be unable to commit suicide with any of the options the government has charitably left me: Blow out my brains and let my husband clean up the mess, hang myself so he can find my blue and bloated body, or drink anti-freeze and die a lingering, agonizing death.

    Tell me, where is the dignity I deserve? Why should I not have the right to squeeze every minute of life out, until I'm bedridden, gasping and asking for help to end the misery? I do not have the right simply because this society denies me that right, forces me to accept a lingering, painful "natural" death or commit a bloody, violent suicide months, perhaps years, earlier than I otherwise would have simply because I can't take the chance that I will wake up some day physically unable to do so.

    I want my loved ones to be able to make the choice for me that I can no longer make for myself, and I want my doctor to be able to supply them with the means to do so peacefully and painlessly. That doesn't make me selfish; it makes me human.

  5. #45
    Dungeon Master
    Hooter Babe

    DiAnna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Northern California
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,590
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Euthanasia for the use of humans.

    Quote Originally Posted by petaluna View Post
    Then why not spend the money on making their lives less painful. Give them all the painkillers they need, work on pain to conquer that, work on being kinder to one another for the several other reasons people want to die, like depression and loneliness. Why are we in such a hurry to legalize killing rather than making living the better option?
    Painkillers will not help someone whose lungs are failing, and who will spend months bedridden, body wracked with every painic-stricken, wheezing gasp. You can't just give everyone a shot of morphine and make it all better... not unless it's a damned big shot of morphine, which is all I'm asking for.

  6. #46
    Dungeon Master
    anti socialist

    X Factor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Texas Proud
    Last Seen
    12-10-17 @ 04:24 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    44,721

    Re: Euthanasia for the use of humans.

    Are people really wanting to, what, force doctors to kill people?

  7. #47
    Ideologically Impure
    Simon W. Moon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Fayettenam
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    16,896
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Euthanasia for the use of humans.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gina View Post
    The other day, there was a passing in my town, where it was made obvious in the obituary that the deceased chose this route, to die surrounded by family and loved ones, laughing and joking until the end. That is so much better to me, than the death my uncle suffered. Alone in the middle of the night, because his family had gone home to rest that evening.
    I'd just as soon skip the last trip to the hospital--but not the second to last one.
    I may be wrong.

  8. #48
    Sage
    EagleAye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Last Seen
    03-28-13 @ 09:08 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    5,697

    Re: Euthanasia for the use of humans.

    Quote Originally Posted by X Factor View Post
    Are people really wanting to, what, force doctors to kill people?
    "Force," is completely the wrong word. "Dignity," for the dying is more appropriate.

  9. #49
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio, USA
    Last Seen
    12-10-12 @ 07:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    12,316

    Re: Euthanasia for the use of humans.

    Quote Originally Posted by X Factor View Post
    Are people really wanting to, what, force doctors to kill people?
    Not exactly. But lay people have no legal access to deadly drugs in the US, at least painless ones, without a prescription.

    There's a bigger controversy over such things as removing a feeding tube once it's been inserted, etc. I don't think anyone here is insensitive to the ethics of medical people.

  10. #50
    Dungeon Master
    anti socialist

    X Factor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Texas Proud
    Last Seen
    12-10-17 @ 04:24 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    44,721

    Re: Euthanasia for the use of humans.

    Quote Originally Posted by EagleAye View Post
    "Force," is completely the wrong word. "Dignity," for the dying is more appropriate.
    No? You're not arguing that doctors be compelled to end someone's life?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinkie View Post
    Not exactly. But lay people have no legal access to deadly drugs in the US, at least painless ones, without a prescription.

    There's a bigger controversy over such things as removing a feeding tube once it's been inserted, etc. I don't think anyone here is insensitive to the ethics of medical people.
    Well, I'll be honest, I haven't read every post in this thread. The ones I've seen so far have not even considered the beliefs and/or morals of medical care providers.

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •