Romney-Huntsman is the only rational and logical choice.
That's why its won our poll...but will lose in real life. The Tea Party would never allow such an "Obamanation".
Its not rational nor logical and this is coming from a huge Huntsman fan.
Romney and Huntsman are PRESENTED as essentially the same candidate and have much of the same benefits and negatives. Huntsman attracts few new people to the ticket that Romney doesn't already attract. Huntsman detracts in a similar fashion to Romney. Huntsman brings little to a Romney Presidency from a political science stand point.
Its not rational nor logical at all but would instead go against rationality in regards to the VP choices of most of the recent elections.
Obama's VP = White Old guy who was supposedly "stronger" on Foriegn Policy and lots of experience
McCain = Young Woman who was solidly conservative
Kerry = Young charismatic southerner
Bush = Old respected thinker with "gravitas"
Dole = Progressive, more "moderate" republican
H.W. Bush = Young guy to counter the career politician
Dukakis = Southerner, Texan, who was an "elder statesmen" and experienced
Mondale = Female with a lot of fervor behind her hoping to spark emotion
The three in recent times that don't really fit it? H.W. Bush and Lieberman, both picked primarily due to their success in the primary and party urging (Doesn't fit Huntsman). And then Gore, who was extremely abnormal due to the similarities between him and Bill Clinton in terms of political reach.
Huntsman as a pick for Romney would be an illogical, trend bucking, politically stupid choice. And this is from arguably one of the forums biggest Huntsman fans.