• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How long will you "blame Bush"?

How long will you blame Bush

  • Less than one more year

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Until this term is over

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Forever.

    Votes: 23 71.9%

  • I'm done blaming Bush.

    Votes: 9 28.1%
  • Total voters
    32
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thunder said:
its posted just a few posts up. it has a link and the link has citations.
Click to expand...


Thunder be honest here...do you truly believe that Alqueda organized their 911 team..got them all into the country gave them the funds to prepare they went to flight school in fla...you dont learn to fly in a month...then planned and instituted that plan all in 7 months starting the day bush was innaugarated...your smarter than that thunder....if 911 belongs to anyone it belongs to clinton.....May I ask If you were an adult when clinton was in office...I dont know your age and Im thinking your very young...I was surely an adult through that period and I know just what clinton did NOT do
 
Thunder said:
no, he is telling the truth. Bush did nothing about terrorism or Al Qaeda during his first 8 months in office.

Nothing at all, but read about goats.
Click to expand...

far lefties vouching for each other based on bogus and thin proof hardly is convincing.

You have no idea what Bush did and it is undeniable that OBL started the WTCII plans due to CLinton's weak response to WTCI. But the main problem was the wall between our intelligence agencies that was erected under clinton

and I doubt you have the sort of clearance to have any clue what was going on at the relevant time
 
TurtleDude said:
far lefties vouching for each other based on bogus and thin proof hardly is convincing...
Click to expand...

your ad hom attack is meaningless & pathetic.

..You have no idea what Bush did and it is undeniable that OBL started the WTCII plans due to CLinton's weak response to WTCI....
Click to expand...

I have proven this to be a lie. Clinton acted aggresively against terrorism after the first WTC attack, and this is why there were no more organized attacks on the homeland during his presidency.
 
Thunder said:
your ad hom attack is meaningless & pathetic.



I have proven this to be a lie. Clinton acted aggresively against terrorism after the first WTC attack, and this is why there were no more organized attacks on the homeland during his presidency.
Click to expand...

You have never proven any of your claims other than proving you worship clinton and irrationally whine about Bush. Ipast is hardly some right wing partisan and he has pretty much schooled you
 
TurtleDude said:
more BDS nonsense. It was the wall between the CIA and the FBI that was the main problem-Look to Jamie Gorelik for that policy
Click to expand...
That's bull****. That didn't prevent Clinton from thwarting the attack in 1998-99 when he received a PDB warning him that al-qaeda was preparing an attack inside the U.S. All it took to thwart it was to raise airport security. The same way Bush did after 9.11.

TurtleDude said:
btw where did that push for giving loans to minorities who could not make normal standards come from
Click to expand...
Came from Clinton, Bush, and the Republican Congress under both of them. The proverbial fuse was lit by the federal reserve when they lowered interest rates to record lows, which suddenly made millions eligible for loans they previously did not qualify for.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
That's bull****. That didn't prevent Clinton from thwarting the attack in 1998-99 when he received a PDB warning him that al-qaeda was preparing an attack inside the U.S. All it took to thwart it was to raise airport security. The same way Bush did after 9.11.


Came from Clinton, Bush, and the Republican Congress under both of them. The proverbial fuse was lit by the federal reserve when they lowered interest rates to record lows, which suddenly made millions eligible for loans they previously did not qualify for.
Click to expand...

what happened with the Cole? and why did Clinton's response to WTCI encourage OBL to launch WTCII

what about Carter and mortgages? what about Dodd and Frank
 
TurtleDude said:
You have never proven any of your claims other than proving you worship clinton and irrationally whine about Bush....
Click to expand...

ah, now I see we are resorting to silly Conservative cliche's.

Forgive me for whining about Bush, but he pathetically failed to discover & prevent a terrorist attack that hit me very personally.
 
Thunder said:
ah, now I see we are resorting to silly Conservative cliche's.

Forgive me for whining about Bush, but he pathetically failed to discover & prevent a terrorist attack that hit me very personally.
Click to expand...

so you deny that you blame Bush and worship Clinton?
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
That's bull****. That didn't prevent Clinton from thwarting the attack in 1998-99 when he received a PDB warning him that al-qaeda was preparing an attack inside the U.S. All it took to thwart it was to raise airport security. The same way Bush did after 9.11
Click to expand...

yeah, when it was a little too late.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
The evidence is indisputable -- George Bush was the president on 9.11. He had nearly 8 months to do something about al-qaeda -- he chose to do nothing and hope there would not be an attack.
Click to expand...

Clinton was President when al Qaeda attacked the World Trade center in 1993. Clinton was President while al Qaeda was planning and making preparations for their second attack (which began as early as 1996), in the wake of the disappointing results of their first attack. He was President when the hijackers were designated, and when they came into this country. He was President while the hijackers were taking flying lessons in San Diego. He was President when all but the final stages of this plot were being put together.

You're blaming Bush because he had eight months? Clinton had eight years, from the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center, to the end of his second term. The failure is his.
 
Thunder said:
ah, now I see we are resorting to silly Conservative cliche's.

Forgive me for whining about Bush, but he pathetically failed to discover & prevent a terrorist attack that hit me very personally.
Click to expand...

"pathetically"

even that silly commission that had hacks like ben veniste couldn't come up with something as hackish as that
 
Bob Blaylock said:
Clinton was President when al Qaeda attacked the World Trade center in 1993....
Click to expand...

how many weeks after Clinton was sworn in, did the first WTC attack take place?

if anything, this was the responsibility for Bush 1 to discover, but I respect Bush 1 so I won't go down that road.
 
lpast said:
Thunder you showed no evidence...and you are trying to blame bush for 8 yrs of clintons impotency that enabled terrorists to organize and plan 911...bush was in office a hot 7 months with the first couple trying to get organized....blaming him is absolute nonesense
Click to expand...
Impotency??

At least pretend like you know what you're talking about.

Here's another counter-terrorism ambassador from the State Department ...

"Overall, I give them very high marks." ~ Robert Oakley

"The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama" ~ Robert Oakley
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Impotency??

At least pretend like you know what you're talking about.

Here's another counter-terrorism ambassador from the State Department ...

"Overall, I give them very high marks." ~ Robert Oakley

"The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama" ~ Robert Oakley
Click to expand...

how does that justify the BDS spewage we have seen
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
..Here's another counter-terrorism ambassador from the State Department ...

"Overall, I give them very high marks." ~ Robert Oakley

"The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama" ~ Robert Oakley
Click to expand...

Clinton was obsessed with OBL while Bush ignored him from the get-go.

Had 9-11 not occured, Bush would have continued to ignore Al Qaeda.
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
The evidence is indisputable -- George Bush was the president on 9.11. He had nearly 8 months to do something about al-qaeda -- he chose to do nothing and hope there would not be an attack.

TurtleDude said:
that proves nothing and you are lying
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Where's the lie?

George Bush wasn't president on 9.11? Prove that's not true.

George Bush didn't have nearly 8 monthys to do something about al-qaeda? Prove that he didn't.

George Bush did something to prevent an attack prior to 9.11? Prove that he did something.

I don't see a lie in my post. Let's see you prove that anything I said was a lie.
 
Thunder said:
Clinton was obsessed with OBL while Bush ignored him from the get-go.

Had 9-11 not occured, Bush would have continued to ignore Al Qaeda.
Click to expand...

you just make stuff up
 
Sheik Yerbuti said:
Where's the lie?

George Bush wasn't president on 9.11? Prove that's not true.

George Bush didn't have nearly 8 monthys to do something about al-qaeda? Prove that he didn't.

George Bush did something to prevent an attack prior to 9.11? Prove that he did something.

I don't see a lie in my post. Let's see you prove that anything I said was a lie.
Click to expand...

Not even the nuts like Ben Viniste came up with that nonsense

you whine about Bush with no evidence
 
Thunder said:
I provided evidence to prove it.

What evidence have you provided in this thread? None.
Click to expand...

No you did not

you have a habit of posting assertions that are not relevant or sufficient to back up your claims
 
Thunder said:
this is a lie, as the evidence is just a few post up.
Click to expand...

even Ipast called you out on that nonsense.

quantity is not a substitute for quality
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom